Conservationists are warning of a “butterfly emergency”, as an annual citizen science survey for the insects clocked up its lowest numbers on record.
The Big Butterfly Count, organised by wildlife charity Butterfly Conservation over three weeks in the summer, gets members of the public to spend 15 minutes recording the butterflies they see in their garden, park or countryside.
But this year’s results were the worst in the count’s 14-year history, with participants spotting just seven butterflies on average per count, down almost half on last year’s average of 12, and the lowest the survey has seen.
And 9,000 counts were logged as seeing no butterflies – the highest in the history of the citizen science scheme, which asks people to submit their results even if they do not see any of the insects in their 15-minute count.
Butterfly Conservation said it was the worst summer in the count’s history for butterflies including the common and holly blues, green-veined and small whites, small tortoiseshell, painted lady and Scotch argus.
And four-fifths (81%) of species showed declines in the number of butterflies this year compared to those seen in 2023.
The charity says butterflies were hit by a wet spring and cool summer – but warn that the natural variations in numbers of insects, which are affected by the weather, come on top of long-term serious declines.
Dr Richard Fox, head of science at Butterfly Conservation, said declines are driven by loss of habitat in the 1970s and 1980s as it was ploughed up or built on, and ongoing degradation of the landscape since, including from pesticide pollution, while extreme weather from climate change is taking its toll.
And he said intensive management of the countryside and gardens, including from an “obsession with tidiness that’s just really bad for nature” was also having an impact.
Butterfly Conservation is writing an open letter to Environment Secretary Steve Reed, calling on the Government to declare a “nature emergency” and ban neonicotinoid pesticides with no exceptions.
The pesticides are well-known for their harmful impact on bees, and have been banned in the UK with emergency exemptions granted under some circumstances, but the nature charity is highlighting their impact on butterflies too.
Dr Fox said: “When used on farmland, these chemicals make their way into the wild plants growing at field edges, resulting in adult butterflies and moths drinking contaminated nectar and caterpillars feeding on contaminated plants.”
He said UK must ban the chemicals, warning: “If we don’t act now to address the long-term drivers of butterfly decline, we will face extinction events never before seen in our lifetime.”
He said the neonicotinoid ban on its own would not reverse the declines, but would have a positive impact on insects.
Butterflies are a key indicator species; when they are in trouble we know that the wider environment is in trouble too
In total, just over 935,000 butterflies and day-flying moths were recorded across the UK, in the period from July 12 to August 4, down more than a third on 2023’s figures.
The previous lowest number of butterflies seen per count was in 2022, when an average of just nine butterflies were seen in each 15-minute survey, and this year, a third of the common species of butterflies and day-flying moths included in the count had their worst year on record.
“The results are in line with wider evidence that the summer of 2024 has been very poor for butterflies,” Dr Fox said.
The data gathered by the public also show a decline over the 14 years of the count for a number of common butterflies, including small tortoiseshell and common blue numbers which have more than halved, while green-veined whites are down nearly two thirds (65%).
Overall, the 14-year trends show that 11 species- some two thirds of those included in the count – are declining, and just three species, red admirals, holly blues and small coppers, are increasing.
READ MORE:
- Bog squad restoration project seeks funds to keep going
- One of Scotland’s rarest plants found thriving in Ochil Hills
Dr Fox said: “Butterflies are a key indicator species; when they are in trouble we know that the wider environment is in trouble too.
“Nature is sounding the alarm call. We must act now if we are to turn the tide on these rapid declines and protect species for future generations,” he warned.
He also said participants seeing no butterflies at all this year in their count had caused a perception shift that made people realised the need to take action.
And while he said citizen scientists were “fantastic” in monitoring nature, he added: “At some point we have to say, are we just going to keep counting these things until they’re all gone or are we actually going to do something about it.”
Anyone with an outdoor space can help by creating places for butterflies and their caterpillars, he said, but also called on the Government to step up and take action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here