The UK’s oil and gas industry has been credited with “significant progress” towards its emissions reduction targets, as figures show its greenhouse gas emissions have fallen by 28% since 2018.
According to a report by industry body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK), the decrease means the sector has achieved its 2027 emissions target, of a 25% reduction in emissions from the production of oil and gas, four years ahead of schedule.
The report also showed the sector’s methane emissions plunged by 53% over the same period, achieving its 2030 target of halving methane emissions from oil and gas production seven years early.
Under the North Sea Transition Deal, the UK’s oil and gas industry is committed to reductions in emissions against a 2018 baseline of 10% by 2025, 25% by 2027, and 50% by 2030, with the aim of achieving net zero by 2050.
The decrease means the sector has achieved its 2027 emissions target (Image: WPA Pool)
These targets relate specifically to “upstream” emissions from oil and gas production, and not to emissions generated by the burning of fossil fuels once they have entered use.
Mark Wilson, HSE & operations director at OEUK, said: “We are pleased by the huge efforts made by the UK oil & gas industry and the supply chain to reduce emissions as we scale up new sources of renewable energy.
“Oil and gas will remain essential for decades to come. It is better from all points of view: financial, environmental and social, that energy comes from our own, homegrown North Sea supplies.
“The alternative is importing more of the oil and gas we still need. This can increase the carbon footprint by up to four times and lead to loss of UK revenue, endangering jobs as well as impacting our security of supply.
“The UK oil and gas industry remains committed to its emission reduction targets and has made significant progress, but supportive policies and new investment are essential to ensure the energy transition is achieved without compromising energy security.”
The OEUK report sets out that “improvements” by offshore facility operators accounted for “almost 70%” of the reduction in emissions.
These include, it said, the modification of power systems used to extract oil and gas from reservoirs deep under the seabed, and the introduction of new systems to capture unused gas under pressure that was previously burned off for safety reasons.
Scotland's oil and gas sector remains substantial (Image: PA)
Emissions from these so-called flaring and venting processes have also fallen by more than half (52%) in the past five years.
In response, Tessa Khan from advocacy group Uplift, which campaigns for a rapid and fair transition away from oil and gas production, said: “This is all smoke and mirrors. These short-term targets were so weak as to be almost impossible to miss.
“Look slightly further ahead and the industry is set to bust its future emission reduction targets, which are supposed to be guard rails to ensure the UK meets its climate plans.
“This is transparently part of the industry’s persuasion campaign to be allowed to continue drilling.
“It ignores the fact that the UK, having burned most of its reserves, now gets the majority of its gas imports from Norway, which banned flaring decades ago and whose gas is half as polluting as the UK’s.”
READ MORE:
- Oil and gas ban will devastate jobs, union says
- Fears for Scot shipbuilding as Harland & Wolff enters administration
According to OEUK the North Sea still has the potential to “unlock” the equivalent of 13.5 billion barrels of domestic oil and gas.
The body said securing the continuing supply of “homegrown” energy will support the transition to renewables such as wind and hydrogen by sustaining the energy supply chain.
It added that “unlocking” private investment in homegrown energy will also protect 200,000 jobs, provide billions in revenue to the Treasury, and reduce UK dependence on imports from overseas.
Offshore Energies UK is a trade body for the UK’s offshore energies industry, and represents hundreds of organisations with an interest in offshore oil, gas, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and offshore wind.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel