Scottish Green members have demanded their party’s co-leaders resign amid accusations of a ‘cash for access’ scandal.
Insiders have hit out at Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater’s defence of the reports, describing their actions as a “cover up” and urging the co-leaders to “face the music”.
A Sunday Mail investigation reported the party offered lobbyists “exclusive” access to politicians and party members through the purchasing of a “sponsored lunch” for the price of £700.
It was first offered during the party’s April 4 conference this year, and is on the table again for the upcoming conference next month.
The brochure said: “Get an exclusive table to talk to ministers, MSPs and members during lunch and advertisement in the conference programme.”
READ MORE: Greens facing 'cash for access' accusations over lunches
READ MORE: SNP stalwart blames Sturgeon for Yes demise but remains optimistic
READ MORE: How Indyref transformed Scottish Greens and Patrick Harvie
An “exhibitor reception” was offered at October 2023’s conference which allowed people to purchase an “invitation only opportunity to talk to MSPs, councillors and observers”.
Mr Harvie and Ms Slater were both Scottish Government ministers at the time as part of the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Greens.
Concerns have been raised the offers could have breached the Scottish Parliament’s lobbying rules, however the Scottish Greens have strongly denied the accusations.
The Greens have also said that neither co-leader – or any MSP – had any involvement or signed off on the brochure.
But a party member has told the Herald he believes the party’s co-leaders have “covered up” the issue after Mr Harvie wrote to members on the party’s Slack communication platform to warn on “anonymous attacks” from within the party.
In a message to all party members at 11:32pm on Saturday evening, Mr Harvie said an “unnamed source” was using fringe events at conference and “quite absurdly trying to turn (it) into some kind of scandal”.
Mr Harvie’s, post seen by the Herald, said: “As any party member who attends conference knows, many external organisations take part by putting on stalls, fringes and other events which MSPs and co-leaders often speak at.
“Most of these are charities, trade unions, etc, and like every other party we charge fees for hosting these events, which enables us to make our conferences affordable and accessible for members.”
However, an insider told The Herald the response from Mr Harvie was a “cover up”.
The source said: “The cover up is as bad as any cash for access on show here.
“Members have had no questions answered while our leadership hide behind attacks on this story – failing to take any responsibility.
“It’s obvious that there are no excuses for selling access to ministers and MSPs, but Lorna, Patrick and others won’t face the music and admit to what they’ve done.
“The longer this goes on the more damage will be done to the party. We can only hope they put the party before their own careers and face the music.”
The member went on to tell us: “In my view, that is a clear cash for access issue. It’s clear cut.
“They’re saying pay us £700 and you will get exclusive rights as a result to talk to ministers and MSPs at a table”.
The source added the messaging from the co-leaders on the issue was “clearly nonsense”.
When asked if Mr Harvie and Ms Slater should resign as co-leaders, the insider told the Herald: “Yes, I think they should.”
The Scottish Greens also denies claims it hosts a “private lunch” with those who purchase the deal, and instead states it is a “free lunch” offered to all members, with MSPs “encouraged” to speak with the sponsor to thank them for the support.
According to the Scottish Parliament’s Lobbying Scotland Act 2016, MSPs must follow strict rules.
It states that while members can participate in events where others are charged a fee to attend, “there could be some concern that events falling into the category be a means of ‘buying’ access to MSPs”.
“It is important that there should be no grounds for such a perception,” the Act added.
Dr Will Dinan, a lobbying expert and senior communications lecturer at the University of Stirling, said the accusations could be a “bad look for the Greens”.
He said: “It also appears to breach the rules in place that governs access to ministers.
“There is a clear perception of privileged access created by how this sponsorship is pitched.
“The Greens appear to have travelled some distance from when they were champions of probity when in opposition in Holyrood.”
Mr Harvie and Ms Slater said were active travel and biodiversity ministers respectively in the Scottish Government from August 2021 until April this year when the Bute House Agreement was scrapped by then first minister Humza Yousaf.
A Scottish Greens spokesman said any claims of private lunches with MSPs in exchange for cash was "highly misleading".
He said: "At no point have organisations or individuals had the option of paying for any kind of ‘cosy’ lunch with any of our MSPs as they claimed.
“The Scottish Green Party conference is attended by a range of charities, campaign groups and stakeholders, with sponsorship options where appropriate, like all political parties do. This helps us to pay for the cost of running our conference.”
The spokesman also said the term “exclusive” was used to describe the lunch because there is a single sponsor of the lunch who is in the room with all party members.
The brochure has since been changed to remove mention of ministers and MSPs and now states the lunch would include "politicians and members".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel