Italian prosecutors have requested a six-year prison sentence for right-wing League leader Matteo Salvini for his decision to prevent more than 100 migrants from landing in Italy when he was interior minister in 2019.
The prosecutors in the city of Palermo have accused Mr Salvini - who is currently deputy premier and transport minister in the right-wing government led by Giorgia Meloni - of alleged kidnapping for leaving a migrant rescue ship operated by charity Open Arms stranded at sea for 19 days.
During the 2019 stand-off, some of the migrants threw themselves overboard in desperation as the captain pleaded for a safe, close port. The remaining 89 people on board were eventually allowed to disembark in Lampedusa by a court order.
In a defiant message on social media on Saturday, Mr Salvini wrote: "I would do it all again: defending borders from illegal immigrants is not a crime."
His lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, will make her defence statement in Palermo on October 18, and a first sentence could come by the end of the month.
A conviction - which in Italy is definitive only at the end of a three-stage judicial process - could bar Mr Salvini from holding government office.
Ms Meloni and several ministers of her government have expressed solidarity with the League leader, defending his decisions.
Since she stepped into power in 2022, Ms Meloni has pledged a crackdown on migration, aiming to deter would-be refugees from paying smugglers to make the dangerous Mediterranean crossing.
She wrote on X: "It is incredible that a minister of the Italian Republic risks six years in prison for doing his job defending the nation's borders, as required by the mandate received from its citizens."
Mr Salvini maintained a hard line on migration in his tenure as interior minister in the first government of premier Giuseppe Conte, from 2018-2019.
He imposed a "closed ports" policy under which Italy refused entry to charity ships that rescued migrants in distress across the Mediterranean and he repeatedly accused humanitarian organisations of effectively encouraging people smuggling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel