This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
Are we about to enter uncharted territory in Holyrood? Could this be the year the Scottish Government fails to get its budget through?
In recent pre-Bute House agreement years there was always a bit of a dance. The Greens would say they’re not going to back it, the SNP would say are you sure, the Greens wangle a wee bit something extra and then they do.
Not this time though.
We’re in a post-Bute House Agreement world and after Tuesday’s savings and Wednesday's Programme for Government, the Greens - who have backed every SNP budget since 2016 - are pretty furious.
Commitments on the conversion therapy ban, peak rail fares, the nature restoration fund, rent controls, and free bus travel for asylum seekers have all, says Lorna Slater, been “undone, slashed, watered down or shelved.”
In the chamber, she even used the word “betrayal”.
It’s hard to see the path from betrayal to backing the budget.
If the SNP’s Budget Bill is defeated at Stage 1 or at Stage3, then the government can try again or tweak it or bring in a completely new Bill.
Failing to get a Budget Bill passed does not automatically bring down the government, but a government that cannot get its Budget Bill passed clearly does not have the confidence of Parliament.
That could mean a vote of no confidence in the government, which, if successful, could mean the First Minister resigning, which could then put us in a situation where MSPs cannot agree on a replacement within 28 days, which could then trigger an extraordinary general election.
During the SNP’s first stint as a minority government between 2007 to 2011, the then first minister Alex Salmond and his finance secretary, John Swinney, were able to pass their budget thanks to the support of Tory MSPs.
However, things got a bit trickier in 2009 when its draft budget was defeated by the casting vote of the parliament’s presiding officer, who by convention votes with the status quo.
Rather than risk a snap election, an amended budget was presented a week later and passed with the support of Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat MSPs.
The Holyrood arithmetic means John Swinney needs the support of one other party to get his spending plans through.
There are 129 MSPs in Parliament and the First Minister needs 65.
Currently, he has 62.
We can assume John Mason will probably back the budget - though we still don’t know how long his administrative suspension over social media comments on the war in Gaza will last.
There still needs to be a meeting of the party’s member conduct committee, before the Holyrood group can take action.
It could be that he’s still out of the party when the vote comes in February. Or it could be that he’s not allowed back in at all.
And if there’s something he’s unhappy about, well… For the meantime let’s put him in the mebbe aye pile. That’s 63.
Sign up and get Scotland's top politics newsletter straight to your inbox.
Could Alba’s Ash Regan be tempted? An Alba source says they will need to see “action on independence, a drive towards governing competently again and focus to be put back onto the people’s agenda of health, the economy and jobs.”
The party say they are hopeful Ms Regan “will have the opportunity to raise specific policy matters with the Scottish Government for inclusion in the budget if the First Minister meets with her ahead of its draft publication.”
Particularly, they would like support for her bid to bring in the Nordic Model in Scotland, and create an offence of paying for sexual services.
So lets, for the sake of argument, give the First Minister Alba’s support. That takes him to 64.
Labour and Tory sources insist that when the time comes they will enter negotiations with the SNP in good faith.
But there are red lines and a looming Holyrood election and can either party really prop up John Swinney’s administration?
That seems unlikely.
Which leaves the Lib Dems.
Can they be bought off? If one of them can be convinced to abstain, then John Swinney only needs the 64.
The FM is, we're told, a deal-maker and the Lib Dems say they’re amenable to a deal.
But the SNP don’t seem mad keen.
“This doesn’t feel like a governing party that’s trying too hard to make friends,” a source told the Times.
"Perhaps they have no intention of passing a budget and perhaps we are going to the country sooner rather than later.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel