More than three quarters of Scotland’s fire service estate has decontamination facilities deemed to be “poor or bad”, the service has said as more than £800 million of work is needed.
Analysis by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) and sent to the Criminal Justice Committee ahead of a meeting on Wednesday laid bare the financial issues facing the service’s estate which chief officer Ross Hunter described as “insurmountable”.
In total, the backlog amounts to more than £800 million of work needed across fire stations, vehicles, equipment and IT infrastructure, the document said, despite an increase in budgets this year.
Speaking before the committee on Wednesday, the Fire Brigade Union (FBU) raised concerns about the lack of adequate decontamination facilities available to firefighters after returning from duty.
Asked about the situation in a later session, SFRS director of finance and contractual services Sarah O’Donnell said: “In terms of what percentage of our estate is deemed to be fit for purpose in terms of contaminant control, we have done an overall assessment around both condition and suitability of the estate.
“Suitability is the area that would touch on contaminant control as well as dignified facilities and general suitability in terms of storage areas, garaging the vehicle, etcetera.
“The figure is 77% that are not compliant with these suitability standards, that have been assessed relative to our standard station design.”
The document provided to the committee ahead of the meeting went further.
“This is likely to worsen when our estate is assessed against the standards that are being developed by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) for contaminant control,” it said.
Current levels of capital funding – which rose by 31.5% to £43 million this year – mean “it will take years” to fix the problems, while the estate continues to deteriorate.
In an earlier session on Wednesday, Colin Brown, an executive council member for Scotland with the FBU, said: “Currently, firefighters are attending incidents, being unable to decontaminate post-incident in any meaningful way, being covered through the course of their work in carcinogenic and toxic fire effluents and chemicals and having to take that home to their families in order to shower and decontaminate.
“This is a well known issue, the FBU funded the research that has proven beyond scientific question that is a fact – firefighters are more likely to contract and die from avoidable cancers than the majority of the population.
“This is a public health emergency to the same extend as the asbestos emergency that was recognised through the building industry.”
READ MORE:
- Campaigners demand councils are held 'accountable' over RAAC issues
- Police probe launched after second Paisley car fire in three days
- ScotRail add extra trains for Scotland v Poland clash
FBU research conducted last year suggested firefighters were 1.6 times more likely to die from cancer than the general public.
The SFRS, Mr Brown said, “cannot spend its way out” of the situation with its current budget, as he called for more investment from Government.
But his call comes less than 24 hours after Finance Secretary Shona Robison announced cuts of about £500 million this year to balance the budget.
“It is unacceptable that firefighters are going to their work, unable to shower, unable to access dignified facilities,” Mr Brown added.
Speaking during the hearing, Mr Hunter said the greatest single challenge it faces is the work required on facilities across the country.
“We have got a significant backlog with our capital, which essentially covers our estate of 365 fire stations across Scotland, our vehicles, our equipment, personal protective equipment and ICT (information and communications technology),” he said.
“We don’t like to talk about the overall capital backlog figure, to be perfectly honest, because we recognise it is insurmountable.
“If you’re talking about figures in excess of £800 million, we realise that is an unrealistic figure, but we do believe that we require an increased and sustained investment within our capital allocation so that we can overcome the challenges that we’ve got.”
Currently, 14 stations still have panels made from reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac), which need to be replaced, and the submission from the SFRS showed 29% of the service’s fleet of 1,687 vehicles are older than the assumed replacement age – and 32% of the so-called “heavy fleet” which includes fire appliances.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here