The SNP held its annual conference in Edinburgh at the weekend, where the party spent three days licking its wounds and seeking to regroup.
Read our report here 👈
One of our readers was less than impressed, and today writes that the SNP has not been honest about the reality of the last decade.
Keith Howell of West Linton writes:
"The SNP conference could not be honest about the reality of the last decade of its politics of pretence.
In the run-up to the 2014 independence referendum, the SNP presented a prospectus to the people of Scotland based largely on wishful thinking. Unsurprisingly the majority were unconvinced.
In the intervening years the SNP Government has blamed others for everything that has gone wrong whilst holding out independence as the answer to all our problems. This has culminated in the recent General Election in which the SNP suffered the consequences of too many broken promises, and so often prioritising an imagined future independence over the current realities for the people of Scotland. Meanwhile, across all the essentials we depend on the Scottish Government for, we have seen decline and failings, from education to health, from drug deaths to ferries, from missed environmental targets to levels of homelessness.
In his conference speech John Swinney was at it again, as he committed to ensuring we all come to 'understand' that independence is 'urgent and essential'. He also sought to demonise the new Labour UK Government, wanting to ensure there is someone else to deflect all his Government’s problems on to.
John Swinney is First Minister because the next generation of SNP leadership contenders prefer the old guard to take the brunt of electorate disenchantment with the SNP. They want to pick up the pieces afterwards, with Scotland meanwhile having to suffer all the consequences of continued SNP incompetence and misjudgements."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel