Kemi Badenoch and James Cleverly launched their bids to lead the Conservative Party on Monday after Rishi Sunak announced his resignation in July following the party's worst election defeat in more than a century to Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour.
Ms Badenoch vowed to tell her colleagues and the country “hard truths”, as she launched her campaign by setting out her vision of a smaller state with more emphasis on the family.
She is the bookmakers’ favourite to win and accused the last Tory government — in which she was business secretary — of “drift” and having “talked right, but governed left”.
Former home and foreign secretary Mr Cleverly also launched his own campaign vowing to restore business confidence in his party and announced he would reinstate the last administration's Rwanda deportation policy if he won power.
They are among two of six Tory MPs running to lead the party.
- READ MORE: John Swinney faces ‘watershed’ week amid swingeing cuts
- READ MORE: SNP conference: Why members are upbeat despite election loss
The other contenders are former immigration minister Robert Jenrick, ex-security minister Tom Tugendhat, former home secretary Dame Priti Patel and Mel Stride, who was work and pensions secretary in the last Conservative government.
A vote of Tory MPs on Wednesday will begin to thin the field, while the eventual winner is not due to be announced until November though pressure is growing in some quarters of the party for the final stage of the race to be expedited so that Mr Sunak’s successor is in place to respond to Labour’s first Budget on October 30.
The new entrants in the UK contest came as the three remaining contenders in the Scottish Conservative leadership race - Murdo Fraser, Russell Findlay, and Meghan Gallacher - took part in their first televised debate on STV last night.
Leadership contests in UK and Scottish politics have become in recent years fairly regularly events. However what is highly unusual is two leadership contests taking place in parallel in one party on different sides of the border. The winner of the Scottish race will be declared at the end of this month, meaning he or she will not know who their new 'boss' in London will be when they are elected.
Does that matter?
Simple reasoning suggests it's important for the two leaders to get on and are in broad agreement on their political outlooks on issues like the economy, public services and the UK's role in the world.
Recent history of the party on the two sides of the border has shown big problems when the two leaders did not have a decent relationship.
Former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson was famously on different sides of the Brexit divide from Boris Johnson during the EU referendum and made no secret of the fact that she did not want Mr Johnson as PM.
Her allies even launched "Operation Arse" to stop Mr Johnson's rise to the top job.
Perhaps wisely, Ms Davidson stood down from the role of Scottish Conservative leader in August 2019, shortly after Mr Johnson became UK Tory leader and Prime Minister after "Operation Arse" failed miserably.
Ms Davidson's successor Jackson Carlaw was then, however, left to deal with Mr Johnson as UK Tory leader and PM and it quickly became evident the two were not compatible either.
Shortly after his election as Scottish Conservative leader in February 2020 Mr Carlaw stated he would be in charge of the policies of the Scottish Conservatives, even if they were at odds with the UK party position but by that July he had resigned from the role with Douglas Ross succeeding him.
His relationship with Mr Johnson proved difficult.
After the brief spell of Liz Truss's premiership there was huge relieve among Scottish Conservative MSPs when Mr Sunak became PM.
So who succeeds Mr Sunak and Mr Ross will be key to the fortunes of the party on both sides of the border.
But judging from experience the new Scottish Conservative leaders will need to have a good working relationship with their counterpart in London - otherwise he or she may find they have a rather short lived career in charge of the party in Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel