Ousted MP David Duguid has said he would have won the seat lost by party leader Douglas Ross.
Mr Duguid was barred by Scottish Conservative officials from running for the Aberdeenshire North and Moray East seat, citing health reasons.
Earlier this year, he suffered a spinal stroke and subsequently contracted pneumonia, telling the BBC he “flatlined” on two occasions.
But the former MP – who represented the now defunct Banff and Buchan seat since 2017 – said he would have won the contest Mr Ross lost to the SNP on July 4.
Read More:
-
'Calculating bastards' Douglas Ross hits out at MSPs who briefed against him
-
Ofcom investigating Sky News election interview with Douglas Ross
-
Swinney blames Ross for 'doing more than anyone else' to make Scottish politics toxic
Asked in an interview with the BBC if the party made the wrong decision in barring him from standing, Mr Duguid said: “Evidently – we lost the seat.
“I think I would have won it.
“The last official communication I had with the party when they came to visit me that last time, I didn’t know Douglas was going to be the candidate.”
He went on to say he “had the incumbency” and constituents “knew me, and I’m a half decent MP or a fully decent MP”.
He added: “I thought any new candidate was not going to have that incumbency, which may not be worth that many votes, but it could have made a difference between winning or losing.”
The decision of Mr Ross to step into the seat in the days before nominations closed, Mr Duguid said, made the situation “even worse”.
Within days of the decision to stand again for Westminster, Mr Ross announced he would step down as party leader after the election and would quit as an MSP if he won the contest.
Mr Ross lost the seat to the SNP’s Seamus Logan by less than 1,000 votes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel