Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of “petty” behaviour after it emerged that he had a portrait of Margaret Thatcher removed from Downing Street.
According to his biographer, the Prime Minister is said to have found the painting of the former Conservative leader “unsettling.”
READ MORE
- Swinney: Free services will remain despite tough economic choices
- Scottish economy grows but Kate Forbes flags Brexit effect
- Parents confirm 'David vs Goliath' council legal action
The picture of Ms Thatcher was commissioned by Gordon Brown in 2007 when she visited him for tea at No 10, a few months into his premiership.
It was painted by royal artist Richard Stone, with an anonymous donor stumping up the £100,000 cost.
When it was unveiled in 2009, it was hung in the former No10 study, unofficially known as the Thatcher Room, which, at the time, was used by Mr Brown for meetings with foreign dignitaries
Speaking at an event organised by Glasgow’s Aye Write book festival, Tom Baldwin said he was recently taken to the room by the Labour leader.
He said Sir Keir described the study as a “place where we can go and have a quiet talk.”
“We sat there, and I go, ‘It’s a bit unsettling with her staring down as you like that, isn’t it’?” Mr Badlwin said.
He said the Prime Minister replied, with a “Yeah.”
Mr Baldwin then asked if he would "get rid of it.”
The writer said Sir Keir nodded, adding “And he has.”
It was the first painting of a former Prime Minister ever to be commissioned by No 10.
When it was unveiled, Mr Stone said he believed it would “remain in Downing Street forever.”
The three hopefuls for the Scottish Tory leadership race hit out at the Prime Minister.
Russell Findlay said: “Gordon Brown commissioned this portrait after calling the first female Prime Minister ‘a conviction politician who saw the need for change’.
“I agree with Gordon Brown’s reasonable position to treat his political opponents with decency and respect.
Read more:
- Sir Keir Starmer planning new pet for No 10
- Scottish Government awarded £545,000 care contract to firm it knew was 'dishonest'
- Fears Scotland could miss landfill targets as recycling rates stagnate
“Keir Starmer seems to have a much more petty approach.”
Murdo Fraser said: "It is disappointing to see a portrait of our first female Prime Minister being removed from display by the new Labour Prime Minister.
“It seems like a churlish move, but perhaps Sir Keir Starmer was intimidated by the gaze of a world-renowned leader whose achievements he will never come close to matching."
Meghan Gallacher said: "It's disgraceful that Keir Starmer would remove a picture of Britain's first female Prime Minister.
"Regardless of your opinions on Margaret Thatcher, she paved the way for women in politics and tackled sexist stereotypes head on.
"She's an inspiration for many, a defining figure in British politics and she deserves to be recognised for her many achievements.
"Her legacy should be honoured, the portrait should be returned."
No 10 declined to comment.
There was anger from some in Labour at the time of the commission, with one anonymous MP telling the Mail on Sunday: “Maggie Thatcher is the devil incarnate to many of our supporters who remember how she destroyed the unions and put our people on the dole. Gordon Brown may have forgotten that. Some of us haven't.”
Sir Keir has previously praised Baroness Thatcher.
Last December, writing in the Sunday Telegraph, the Labour leader said Thatcher had “set loose our natural entrepreneurialism” during her time as prime minister.”
“Across Britain, there are people who feel disillusioned, frustrated, angry, worried. Many of them have always voted Conservative but feel that their party has left them,” he said.
“I understand that. I saw that with my own party and acted to fix it. But I also understand that many will still be uncertain about Labour. I ask them to take a look at us again.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel