It’s often said by people that the best pint is the one you have in an airport before going on holiday. Other people wonder how someone can be interesting in drinking beer at 5am before their early morning flight.
It could become a thing of the past though if Ryanair chief executive Michael O’Leary has anything to do with it. He has wants to limit the amount of alcohol that can be served in airports in a bid to curb growing anti-social behaviour.
He told the Daily Telegraph that violent outbursts are occurring weekly with alcohol, particularly when mixed with other substances. He believes putting a limit in of two pints will make a difference to how passengers are when they board their flights.
“We don’t want to begrudge people having a drink. But we don’t allow people to drink-drive, yet we keep putting them up in aircraft at 33,000 feet, adding it was difficult for airlines to identify inebriated people at the gate, especially when boarding in a group.
Read More:
-
Ryanair boss calls for two-drink airport limit to curb in-flight violence
-
Ryanair suggests soaring ticket prices may soon return to Earth
“As long as they can stand up and shuffle they will get through. Then when the plane takes off we see the misbehaviour.
“In the old days, people who drank too much would eventually fall over or fall asleep. But now those passengers are also on tablets and powder.
“It’s the mix. You get much more aggressive behaviour that becomes very difficult to manage.”
Do you agree with these proposals? Should airports be limited on the amount of alcohol they can serve?
Let us know what you think by voting in our Herald poll and in the comment section below.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel