By Colin McLean
After the euphoria of the past 18 months, investors are beginning to question the level of the US stock market.
Is AI (artificial intelligence) really worth the $3 trillion that was added to the valuation of the big global tech companies? Investors were betting that the promised improvements to work and life will be very profitable for the suppliers.
But some economists are more sceptical of the likely productivity boost, with many businesses struggling to see exactly how they should harness the new technology. And there is a risk that the social impact of the technology will be too important to leave to businesses and the tech giants.
Already there are fears about biases and misuse of data. Some AI models have been found to ‘hallucinate,’ creating content that is untruthful or does not match the facts provided. There are gaps in trust and regulation; the field has developed faster than effective control. Last November the UK hosted an AI safety summit but it is a tough ask to translate promises by almost 30 governments and global technology companies into action. A bi-polar world is not the best setting to create international cohesion and new institutions.
READ MORE: Are critics too quick to judge Scotland's investment bank?
Some of the challenges are hard to quantify but nevertheless look serious. AI may initially compete with the cheapest available workers, often trainees and interns. Investment firms, for example, have found that attending company results meetings and summarising what is interesting can be done by AI remotely, condensing the meeting transcripts.
It looks like a productivity boost but means less work for investment analysts who traditionally would have started their careers in that role. Certainly, it might allow everyone to move up to work of higher added value - more judgement, less data collection – but it is easy to see the potential for widening inequality.
Entry-level jobs could be squeezed and we should not assume that AI will solve the problem of decline in the working age population. It means that economic policy must emphasise re-skiling and continuous education.
AI has the potential to create immersive learning and help citizens navigate complex areas requiring personalised advice, like healthcare. It can also evaluate medical scans, with one US study finding superior performance in diagnosis when compared with clinicians.
READ MORE: Popular crisps win first supermarket deal outside Scotland
Financial services will also harness AI to deliver lower cost products and better match those to customer needs and risk tolerance. In the last twelve months many users of public and private services will have found chatbots are the only entry into accessing help, and the boundary between AI and human engagement is increasingly blurred.
But public policy is needed to ensure this does not create a barrier of digital exclusion for those less able to use the technology. Some service organisations have been quick to withdraw phone contact or use no-reply emails. New interfaces with customers may make service provision manageable in a world of working from home but standards of practice should be set to ensure equality in access. In the early years of AI adoption this looks like the issue that poses the biggest social risk.
Innovative technology often means rational thought goes out the window. There is a fascination with shiny new things that can lead to wasteful business investment and stock market bubbles.
Already AI has been embedded in products ranging from toothbrushes to prams, without apparent customer benefit. In the US there are 1,400 start-up firms claiming AI innovation, but most are likely to fail as actual real-world applications become clearer. We may be seeing a parallel with the dot-com bubble. In a more recent example of overblown expectations, Bitcoin has given stockmarket investors big gains, but the promised uses for blockchain technology have been slow to materialise.
The best uses for AI may take time to develop, but already it can gather data effectively and personalise service experience. This can improve work and lives, even if it does not show up in economic growth and productivity statistics. But there is a role for standards and public policy to ensure AI reflects society’s values and the benefits are fairly distributed.
Colin McLean is a director of SVM Asset Management Holdings
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here