Fiona Hyslop has suggested a scheme to cut rail fares for peak time travellers could return in the future but insists the Scottish Government can’t afford to continue with subsidised tickets at present.
The Government has come under fire after it was announced on Tuesday that the trial would come to an end on September 27, with a report saying it had only achieved ‘limited increase’ in rail passenger numbers and didn’t result in a ‘significant modal shift’ away from the car.
There had been £40 million spent by the Government on the year-long scheme, which sees all travellers pay off-peak prices on Scotrail services regardless of the time they travel.
On Wednesday however, Ms Hyslop suggested it could return at some point in the future – if finances permit.
She said she is “prepared to go back to this” as she conceded it will “take years” to shift commuters from cars to public transport.
Read More:
-
Return of peak fares won't strengthen the ScotRail business model
-
“Entirely out of people’s reach" passengers react to removal of subsidised rail fares
However the Transport Secretary told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme: “At this present time we cannot afford the level of public investment, subsidy, call it what you will, to put into the sector at this time.”
She said ministers had twice extended the trial, which was initially only due to run for six months, in a bid to give it the “best chance of success”.
She added: “If we are using public funding and public subsidy to cut prices, we need to demonstrate it is having the impact that the pilot was meant to achieve, which was to try to shift more people to rail, to choose to use rail, not their car.
“Now that hasn’t shown evidence to the level that would justify that level of investment and we are living in tough financial times.”
With the Scottish Government seeking to encourage more people to use public transport instead of their cars as part of efforts to tackle climate change, Ms Hyslop said there will need to be “big measures in the future to try to make sure that people are choosing to use public transport”, but she also stressed ministers need to “make sure we use public funding in the best way”.
She added: “With the UK Government’s austerity as it is just now and continuing, it is very difficult to justify.”
She accepted the decision to end the pilot will be “disappointing” for rail travellers, but added: “We did say back in May when we extended it that we needed people to use the rail, to demonstrate in numbers, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to continue. Unfortunately we are not able to continue.
“If we are going to be able to use public investment to tackle climate change, there are measures that might have more impact than this.”
With ScotRail services having been reduced by a temporary timetable, brought in to cope with drivers refusing to work overtime, Ms Hyslop said the publicly-owned rail operator is training more staff to deal with the situation in the long term.
She said: “Drivers can choose under their own contract whether they work overtime or rest days.
“We have already employed 250 more people since public ownership of ScotRail, and indeed there is another 160 drivers currently being trained.
“That in the future will stand us in good stead.”
She stressed the desire to have “stability in our system”, but also made clear it “takes quite some time” to train new train drivers.
However she said: “I would hope in the future we would not have to have suspended timetables, that we would be able to rely on the number of drivers that have been recruited.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel