VAR has been excellent for Scottish football, Douglas Ross has insisted.
Speaking at In Conversation event at The Stand Comedy club during the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, the Scottish Tory leader and assistant referee also addressed Celtic fans holding up a huge banner attacking him.
During a Scottish Cup tie between Celtic and St Mirren in 2023, the Green Brigade supporters’ group revealed a huge banner that read “VAR DECISION: DOUGLAS ROSS IS A C***”.
It came after a goal by Daizen Maeda was reviewed by the video technology.
Mr Ross was running the line as an assistant referee during the contest.
Speaking to the journalist Graham Spiers, Mr Ross said he hoped that because the “word that rhymes with hunt” was used in the banner, “it wouldn't really get reported.”
“It turns out they could, but just fit in asterisks.”
He said he had speaking about it recently with the sons of friends who had not realised he was the “Celtic banner boy.”
“It was in a Scottish Cup game, it was a late kickoff, and I remember I just awarded a goal to a Celtic. It was the first goal of the match.
“It was a tight onside, offside decision. I kept my flag down. VAR confirmed straight away that the goal was good.
“So my first point was, why are they putting that up? I've made a decision correct in favour of Celtic. You know, if I got it wrong, I could understand that.
“And then I thought secondly, I don't want to look at it too much, because I don't want a picture taken of me staring at this. But still, they managed to do it.
“And then I just thought, well, it's done now, I thought that looks pretty big, but maybe I've just got such great eyesight as a linesman that it's bigger than it actually is.
“But it turned out, no, it was pretty big.
“And in fairness, referee was Stephen McLean. He was very supportive, as was the rest of the team over the comms and and afterwards.
“And you know, there's nothing I could do about it. What I was determined to do was not let that affect my decision making, and it's one of the things you have to do.
”Sometimes in politics, you've got to switch off and focus on what's in front of you, but certainly in football, you've just got to ignore everything else and focus on making sure you don't make any mistakes in the remainder of the match.”
Read more:
ScotRail peak fares to be brought back in September
Asked for his opinion on VAR, he said: “I think it's excellent for football. I think it can be improved. I think we can get quicker. I think some things can be better.
“But ultimately, and I was operating with it in Europe before we had it here in Scotland, so it was a group of us who were very strong advocates in Scotland, including William Collum, who's now our head of refereeing in Scotland.
”We'd seen the benefits of it in Europe.
”And the benefits are, why should the four people making the decisions on the pitch, the referee, his two assistants and the fourth official, be the only people in the whole stadium who don't know a mistake’s been made, because we've got to the stage where everyone's got an iPhone now, everyone can see a clip.
“I mean, you can watch any level of football anywhere in the world on your phone at any point, so we have that technology.
“Why would you put officials into a situation where they're humans, they make mistakes, and don't give them the tools to make sure if they err on the pitch, that that is reversed, and ultimately no team loses out.
“There will still be mistakes with VAR because it's human beings that are doing it, but the number of mistakes will be vastly reduced.
“But I accept it does take away from people's enjoyment. I see players not celebrating a goal because they think it's going to be chopped off, and fans are waiting in the stands.
“But I think, as I say, we can be more efficient. We can get better. But ultimately, if it stops a team losing points and potentially losing thousands or millions of pounds because of placings in the league, then it's got to be a good thing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel