It’s the closing weeks of what has been a dreary excuse for summer, an unfortunately apt setting for the latest news on rising household energy prices heading into autumn.
The next quarterly price cap announcement by industry regulator Ofgem is expected to be announced on Friday and will cover what energy suppliers can charge from the beginning of October through to the end of this year. After two consecutive reductions in the maximum charges allowed, some might have hoped that the UK was on a steady path back to pre-crisis prices but that is not the case.
Analysts at Cornwall Insight – which is widely regarded for the accuracy of its predictions – have issued their final forecast for the October to December period and are expecting a 9% increase to £1,714 in the annual bill for homes using a typical amount of gas and electricity. That would be an increase of £146 per year from the current annual bill, which is sitting at it lowest for two years.
READ MORE: Great British Energy legislation tabled in Commons
That means that bills will still be roughly 65% higher than prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which is firm confirmation that the UK’s energy crisis is far from over.
While prices have stabilised somewhat compared to the last two years, markets remain highly sensitive to any global events that could disrupt supplies. The UK’s heavy reliance on imported energy leaves it vulnerable to the global volatility that has pushed up the wholesale cost of gas, which is paid by domestic suppliers, by roughly 20% in the last few months.
What’s worse, Cornwall Insight is expecting a further “modest” rise when the price cap for the first quarter of 2025 is announced in November. But this could be optimistic, as recent tensions in the Russia-Ukraine war could see prices rise more sharply at the start of the new year.
Craig Lowrey, principal consultant at Cornwall Insight, said he doesn’t expect a return to the extreme prices of recent years but it is also unlikely that household bills will fall to what was once considered “normal”. Without “significant intervention”, this “may well be the new normal”.
“The government will need to adopt a two-pronged approach to tackle rising energy bills,” Mr Lowrey added. “Immediate action is needed to ease the financial burden on households – such as the introduction of social tariffs, or reform of the price cap – but that’s only part of the solution.
READ MORE: New energy price cap won't fix the import conundrum
“We must also develop a long-term strategy to secure our energy future. This means a fundamental overhaul of our energy system, with a strong emphasis on increasing domestic energy production.”
On this latter point, the new-ish Labour government has invested significant political capital in plans to establish Great British Energy, a publicly-owned investment vehicle to help build low-carbon infrastructure. GB Energy won’t supply electricity directly to households, but instead will co-invest with the private sector in emerging energy technologies such as windfarms, green hydrogen, solar power and nuclear energy.
Another part of its remit is to create a “just transition” away from oil and gas into green energy which is to include the creation of a “huge number” of skilled jobs in Scotland, according to Prime Minister Kier Starmer. This is no doubt the reason why GB Energy will be headquartered in Scotland as a means of soothing the loss of the traditional offshore energy sector.
There’s a lot riding on this, and on the face of it GB Energy appears to have significant financial backing with a budget of £8.3 billion of public money over the course of this parliament. However, it is questionable whether even this large chunk of money will be enough to unlock the £60 billion in private sector investment that is being targeted.
Even if it does succeed on this front it’s difficult to see GB Energy as anything other than a minority co-investor, rather than a serious rival to the private sector. As the Common Wealth thinktank has pointed out, a lack of well-funded state intervention would result in the current market model of “uncoordinated [investment], replete with barriers and delays and vulnerable to policy errors”.
READ MORE: GB Energy and why investment in Scotland is the key
Ed Miliband, the Secretary of State for Energy Security, has the lead on the GB Energy project and it will be his task to avoid these pitfalls while also lowering household bills by an average of £300 per year. Given the volatility in the market, and with a price cap that changes accordingly every three months, it will be interesting to see how that target is measured and judged.
Secure and affordable energy is of grave importance to long-term prosperity, so hopefully GB Energy will ultimately deliver. However, none of the activities in these early days of its inception will assist the millions of households struggling to stay warm in the coming winter.
The entire market is in need of reform – not just the source of our energy, but how it is distributed and paid for. The vulnerable still require protection in the short term from rising energy bills, which is why Ofgem is currently in the midst of a comprehensive review of the price cap and eying up potential changes to elements such as standing charges that weigh unfairly on those doing all they can to cut their consumption.
It has been said before and it remains true that the price cap, first introduced in January 2019, has evolved far beyond its intended purpose to act as a de facto regulated market price that is driving inflation by discouraging competition among retail energy suppliers. Cornwall Insight noted that the average annual saving from the top 10 cheapest tariffs on the market in August was a mere £5 when compared to the default tariff set by the price cap.
As Mr Lowrey points out, simply waiting for prices to drop on their own isn’t an option. A proactive approach taking coordinated account of current and future needs, and all aspects of the dysfunctional energy market, is imperative.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel