A committee scrutinising plans to legalise assisted dying has been told that ‘no-one should be eligible’ by the head of a campaign group who oppose the proposals.
Dr Gordon Macdonald is the chief executive officer of campaign group Care Not Killing Alliance (CNK) and was responding to a call for evidence on the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill and described the plan to legalise assisted dying as ‘uncontrollable, unethical and unnecessary’.
He said medical professionals had a “duty to preserve life, not end it” and that many clinicians were opposed to the proposals, which he said would create ethical problems for staff, add to doctors’ workloads and undermine palliative care provision.
He also said the legislation risked leading to vulnerable people being coerced into assisted dying when they should be receiving better “care and support”.
Read More:
- Assisted dying: 'We quibble about words, this is really about legalised euthanasia'
-
Jacq Kelly: It's assisted living we need, not assisted dying
-
Mark McGeoghegan: Here’s why the assisted dying debate has not been hijacked – yet
He noted that in Ontario in Canada, where assisted dying is legal, the service “was accessed disproportionately by the most marginalised and economically deprived in society”.
He added: “In jurisdictions like Oregon (US), fear of being a burden is routinely cited as a reason for seeking assisted suicide (47.1% since 2001), more often than concerns over pain (28.8%).
“Professor Theo Boer, a Dutch former euthanasia regulator, addressed MSPs on the ‘dilemma of the choice’ in 2021: feeling pressure to ‘do the right thing.'”
Dr Macdonald also questioned the effectiveness of safeguards in the Bill designed to protect vulnerable people, which include the need for examination by two doctors, tests of capacity and coercion, and a period of reflection.
He said that not only were these measures in themselves flawed, but they could be “dispensed with entirely” if the law were to change in future.
Dr Macdonald summarised his objections in his written submission: “Uncontrollable: once the principle is accepted, it is subject to abuse and extension as lines are redrawn and so-called safeguards are dismantled. Any limit other than prohibition is arbitrary and ripe for challenge.
“Unethical: legalisation makes it a (cheap) treatment option to be routinely offered alongside others. Saying some suicides are to be prevented and others assisted necessarily undermines suicide prevention initiatives and devalues lives.
“Unnecessary: end-of-life suffering and constraints on living with dignity are often rooted in a lack of access to care and support.
“Sue Ryder estimates that up to 90% of people dying in the UK have palliative care needs (and the number of people requiring palliative care in Scotland is projected to increase by 14-20% by 2040).
“But less than 50% have access, driven by geographical, diagnostic and personal inequalities, with too many unable to access 24/7 support and too many reliant on financially vulnerable hospices.”
Dr Macdonald also raised concerns that the Bill, which would apply to terminally-ill adults over the age of 16 who had resided in Scotland for at least 12 months and were registered with a GP, would be used by young people seeking assisted dying.
He said that unlike comparable legislation in other jurisdictions, the Bill did not require consultation with the parents or guardians of people aged 16 or 17.
He added: “Belgium extended its euthanasia law to children of all ages in 2014 and Canada and the Netherlands have been preparing for similar extensions. The expansion being considered in Canada would apply to ‘mature minors’.
“This is how fast the debate shifts once the principle is accepted.”
Dr Macdonald was responding to the call for evidence by the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee concerning the Bill proposed by Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur.
The window for submissions closed on Friday August 16.
CNK is a UK-based alliance of individuals and organisations that promotes more and better palliative care; works to ensure existing laws against euthanasia and assisted suicide are not weakened or repealed; and aims to influence the balance of public opinion against any further weakening of the law.
Since 2019, CNK has supported the development of Our Duty of Care, a network of healthcare professionals opposed to the legalisation of assisted suicide.
The palliative care and bereavement charity Sue Ryder, whose statistics were quoted by Dr Macdonald, added that it takes a neutral position on the issue of assisted dying but campaigns to ensure essential improvements to palliative care are made so that no-one faces death alone.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel