The attainment gap for Highers has risen to its highest level since the new qualifications were introduced, according to official exam results released today.
Information published by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) for the 2023/34 school year shows a gap of 17.1 percentage points in the Higher pass rate between those from the richest and poorest parts of Scotland. This means that the gap is larger than last year, when it stood at 16 percentage points, and also higher than at any point since the new versions of qualifications were introduced around a decade ago.
The most recent statistics show that the Higher pass rate for pupils from the most affluent 20% of Scotland stood at 82.2 percent, whereas the same figure for those from the most deprived 20% of the country was just 65.1 percent.
The overall Highers pass rate has also fallen to 74.9 percent. This figure is much lower than any figure recorded during or since the pandemic, and is effectively the same as the 2019 pass rate, which was itself the lowest recorded pass rate in the preceding ten years. As a result, the Higher pass rate is now at its lowest level since 2007.
The National 5 attainment gap has also risen, increasing from 15.6 percentage points last year to 17.2 percentage points in the latest set of results. This is higher than all previous years. The overall pass rate for National 5 also fell from 78.9 percent to 77.2 percent.
At Advanced Higher level, the attainment gap increased from 11.5 percentage points in 2023 to 15.5 percentage points this year, while the pass rate dropped from 80.2 percent to 75.3 percent.
The Higher attainment gap fell to its lowest recorded level in 2020, when it stood at just 6.4 percentage points, while the National 5 and Advanced Higher gaps that year were also at all-time lows of 7.9 percentage points and 2.8 percentage points respectively. This occurred after exams were cancelled and grades were awarded based on the work students had completed throughout the year.
Since then, the gaps at National 5 and Higher increased each year as normal examination arrangements have been gradually reintroduced.
The attainment gap at Advanced Higher actually fell between 2022 and 2023, but this was only because the pass rates for the most affluent pupils fell much more than those for pupils from the most deprived areas.
The proportion of pupils achieving A grades at Higher level has also fallen since last year, although it remains above the levels recorded in 2019. The same pattern is found at National 5, but for Advanced Higher a smaller percentage of pupils achieved an A grade that was the case pre-pandemic.
The pass rate for National 4 qualifications, which are internally assessed and do not have a final exam, has also fallen to the lowest recorded level. This year, the success rate for this qualification was 84.5%, having previously stood at 90% or more until 2019.
The release of results was also affected by problems that saw young people across the country receive blank results emails, while others reported that text messages with exam results did not arrive. The SQA has acknowledged this problem and reissued the emails, which The Herald understands are now arriving with the correct information. During a briefing with journalists this morning, the SQA was unable to explain what had happened that led to the incomplete emails being sent to pupils.
Fiona Robertson, Chief Executive of the SQA and Scotland's Chief Examining Officer, said:
"Our warmest congratulations to the 145,000 learners across Scotland whose achievements are being celebrated today. They can be rightly proud of their positive performance."
The SQA also argued that "comparisons with other years should be treated with caution."
The 2024 results data also reveals a significant rise in some alternative qualifications available to secondary school pupils. The completion of the most popular of these - known as National Progression Awards - increased from 11,210 to 14,230 at level 5 (equivalent to National 5), and from 7,105 to 8,585 at level 6 (equivalent to Higher).
Andrea Bradley, General Secretary of the EIS teaching union, said that the increase in non-traditional courses "reflects an appetite among many students for a senior phase which is more flexible and tailored to their individual needs and interests- whether they aspire to continue their learning at college, university or in the world of work."
"This year’s results also underscore the need for urgent reform of senior phase assessment and qualifications. Review after review of Scottish Education, most recently the Hayward Review, has highlighted how the current treadmill of high-stakes exams is not fit for purpose, least so for the most socio-economically disadvantaged students; and must be reformed. It is imperative that the Scottish Government gets moving on implementing the reforms as recommended by the Hayward Review more than a year ago. The EIS very much looks forward to the Government’s long-awaited response to the Review, and hopes to see decisions made that are solidly in the interests of sound education and social justice."
In a statement issued by the Scottish Government, education secretary Jenny Gilruth congratulated young people receiving their results:
"Their resilience is remarkable, and their achievements all the more impressive given the significant disruption to learning due to the pandemic at the end of primary school and start of the secondary school journey. Today is a chance to celebrate the full breadth of achievements attained by Scotland’s young people."
She also argued that the "poverty related attainment gap has reduced by 60% since 2009 for young people leaving school and going on to a positive destination, such as work, training or further study."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel