Three police officers were summoned to court to give evidence against someone who had died, prompting claims from the body which represents rank-and-file officers that Scotland’s criminal justice system is “broken”.
The Scottish Police Federation (SPF) highlighted the case, which was called at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, to draw attention to the disruption it says is caused when unnecessary citations are sent out by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS).
In another incident reported in 1919 magazine, an officer who was on maternity leave with a 12-week-old baby was given a last-minute citation due to a colleague, who was on holiday, being excused.
One SPF representative claimed that out of 750 officers in the north area cited for trial since January this year, only 26 actually gave evidence, while one officer was cited 17 times in a month.
The organisation believes the issues at fault include not being countermanded when a trial is no longer going ahead, cases resolving on the day and not being notified if an accused person has died.
David Threadgold, chair of the SPF, told 1919 magazine: “Through an operational policing lens, the criminal justice system is broken.
“Police officers understand that attending court is a core part of their business – the consequences for failing can affect their liberty – but their duty to react to the requirements, and the perceived whims of the COPFS, do have an impact, and that is being felt across areas of the service far beyond simply attending court.
“The COPFS is understaffed, overworked, inefficient in its administration, it communicates badly with partners and makes decisions which adversely impact on police officers and their families without the slightest thought for the consequences.”
A COPFS spokesperson said: “Police witnesses provide vital evidence during court proceedings and significant effort is made to respect their time.
“COPFS appreciates that unnecessary citations are a source of personal frustration for officers and a waste of resources.
READ MORE: Police body issues statement after officers injured in M8 crash
READ MORE: 'Will the SNP listen and will justice finally be served?'
“Operating an effective court programme is a challenge for the whole criminal justice system. We work with justice sector partners, including Police Scotland, to arrange court business but there are occasional mistakes in citing witnesses.
“Processes are being reviewed and developed to improve our communication regarding witness citations and countermands and COPFS is working closely with justice partners to ensure the continued delivery of criminal business through the courts.”
Assistant Chief Constable Wendy Middleton, of Police Scotland, said the force is “committed to working with partners to change policy and practice around how we manage and progress cases through court”.
She said: “Police officers currently spend considerable time on court business and can have shifts, leave and rest days disrupted by requests for attendance.
“This is not only costly by removing officers from their local policing areas, but it can have an impact on wellbeing too.
“Police Scotland’s criminal justice improvement group has been set up to alleviate these pressures by looking at direct measures, the development and delivery of summary case management, redeveloping the standard prosecution reports and more efficient ways of court date scheduling.
“Whilst there is, of course, more to be done and system wide reform is overdue, Police Scotland will continue to drive improvements in this area.”
Justice and social affairs magazine 1919 magazine is funded by the Scottish Police Federation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here