Environmentalists are fighting a local authority in court over plans to turn a public park into an industrial site.
Friends of St Fittick’s Park will attend a hearing in the Court of Session in Edinburgh on Monday, where they plan to fight Aberdeen City Council’s plans to turn the park into a site called an Energy Transition Zone (ETZ).
ETZ Ltd is a private sector-led and not-for-profit company spearheading the North East of Scotland’s energy transition ambition, receiving governmental support.
The company’s website says it has a “clear ambition to reposition the region as a globally recognised new and green energy cluster”.
Based in Aberdeen, the company is now facing a backlash from the environmental campaigners, who have been fighting the plans since 2020.
READ MORE: Former manager calls for halt in £4m sale of Cashel Forest
The court is expected to hear evidence from FotE, who are claiming Aberdeen City Council has failed to exercise its duties under the Equality Act 2010, including the failure to conduct an Equalities Impact Assessment, especially given the park is within the top 10% of the Scottish Index of multiple deprivation areas.
Before the court proceedings, campaigners will be joined by supporters from Edinburgh and elsewhere for a short rally outside the Court of Session.
Nathaniel Campbell-Scott-Howells of Torry, Aberdeen, which is where the park is situated, said: “I hope the outcome of the judicial review will be a victory for the people of Torry and the campaign to protect the park.
“We also hope it sparks a national conversation about planning, especially when it comes to energy transition. We have witnessed the relationships between Aberdeen Council, Scottish Government and private interests that appear to usurp any real public control of our land.”
Campaigner Chris Aldred added: “Access to justice in Scotland is prohibitively expensive, and there is no equal right of appeal, thus giving developers an unfair advantage over Scottish communities. It is very encouraging in this context that the judge Lord Fairlie has recognised that there is a case to answer.”
Ishbel Shand, a Friends of St Fittick’s Park campaigner, said: “Aberdeen City Council is a partner in the business plan that created ETZ ltd.
“It has control of the land. It is the planning authority. There was no consultation before St Fittick’s Community Park was rezoned for industry.
“The scheme is, moreover, taxpayer-funded. Surely this is so manifestly unfair that it cannot be legal?”
An ETZ Ltd spokesperson said: “Through our community & coast programme, ETZ Ltd are firmly committed to enhancing wider greenspaces in proximity of the Energy Transition Zone in co-design and collaboration with the local community.
“This will include significant improvements to St Fittick’s Park, Tullos woods and the coastal path corridor as part of the project’s wider regeneration ambitions.
“It is important to highlight that we have proposed utilising, subject to planning, a significantly reduced area of development to St Fittick’s Park with just over half of the Aberdeen City Council proposed sites being developed equating to less than a third of the park overall.
“The ability to connect land with port assets, and transport large components to and from quayside, is a fundamental requirement so we achieve the investment required to ensure Aberdeen is positioned to capitalise on the vast opportunities provided by new and green energies, particularly offshore wind.
“Almost all other ports of scale across Scotland are making similar investments and we simply don’t want Aberdeen to miss out on the opportunity to position itself as a globally recognised hub for offshore renewables and the significant job benefits this will bring.”
Aberdeen City Council was contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel