Fornethy House abuse survivors must be able to access compensation from a Scottish Government scheme, a Holyrood committee has concluded.
The Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee said it reached an “unanimous” view of including the survivors in the Redress Scotland scheme.
More than 200 women have come forward with abuse allegations relating to the residential school in Kilry, Angus, dating back to the 1960s and 70s.
The former residents say they were beaten, humiliated, force-fed and sexually assaulted during their short-term stays at the school, which was then run by Glasgow’s local authority.
Read More:
-
Anger over backlog in Scottish Government redress scheme for child abuse victims
-
Concerns as cost of Scotland's child abuse inquiry soars to almost £65 million
-
Abuse inquiry chair appeals for help investigating schools for deaf children
The Government previously said the scheme, which offers up to £100,000 in compensation for those abused in residential care before 2004, could not cover those from Fornethy House.
That was because of the requirements for the residents to stay in long-term care and to meet strict evidence requirements.
However, records at Fornethy House had been destroyed, meaning survivors were not able to meet these requirements, and the parental consent given by some of the survivors’ parents also made them ineligible, ministers had said.
But in a letter to Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, committee convener Jackson Carlaw said many of the children at the residential home had “limited or no contact” with their parents and relied on the institution for daily care.
He said: “The evidence we have continued to gather has solidified our view that the regulations introduced in December 2021 have created an unjustified barrier preventing those who experienced abuse in settings such as Fornethy House.”
The letter also recommends ministers include residential institutions that were owned and operated by the state, regardless of length of stay, in the compensation scheme, while enabling redress where the abuse was carried out by staff employed by the state regardless of whether parental consent for the child’s placement had been received.
The committee also said while the recommendations may require further legislation, ministers should “not to delay taking action”.
Ms Forbes said: “Abuse of children at Fornethy House should never have happened and I am profoundly sorry for what the survivors endured as children and the impact this abuse has had on their lives.
“The independent report we commissioned to investigate this matter further is clear that children attended Fornethy House primarily on a short-term basis for convalescence or a recuperative holiday under arrangements involving their parent or guardian and another person. Those circumstances, as agreed by the Scottish Parliament, are excluded from the redress scheme which is designed primarily to provide acknowledgement of the harm that has been caused for survivors of historical child abuse who were in long-term care.
“These findings are in no way intended to diminish the experiences of the survivors or to suggest parents of these children were in any way responsible for the experiences they endured during their time at Fornethy House.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel