Labour’s Blair McDougall has denied the party is split on scrapping the two child cap, insisting it is “something we want to do.”
The new MP for East Renfrewshire told the BBC: “Lifting kids out of poverty is what Labour governments do, it’s in our DNA.”
Sir Keir Starmer saw off a rebellion on Monday night, when just seven of his backbenchers supported an SNP amendment to the King’s Speech calling for the welfare limit to be axed.
READ MORE: MPs vote against SNP amendment on two-child benefit cap
The group - which includes former shadow chancellor John McDonnell - have all been suspended for six months.
The cap brought in by George Osborne means that households claiming child tax credit or universal credit are unable to claim for a third or subsequent child.
The only exemption for families is if a third child is the result of “non-consensual conception.”
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the policy currently affects two million children, with more hit each year because it applies to those born after April 5 2017.
Next year, 250,000 more children will be affected, rising to 670,000 before the end of the next parliament.
When fully rolled out, it will affect one in five children, rising to 38% of those in the poorest fifth of households.
READ MORE: Swinney told £50m can prevent Scottish bin strikes
Scottish Labour has previously made their opposition to the cap known, with Anas Sarwar describing the policy as "heinous" and calling for it to be scrapped. Though he has always argued that doing so depends on the state of the economy.
Mr McDougall told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme: “I grew up in a single-parent family that relied on benefits, so for me this is a very personal matter.
“We’re giving them the hope that when they go into work they can be paid enough to support their families, that they can have regular hours, that they can afford their energy bills again. And that is a huge step forward for those families.”
Speaking about the vote, he added: “What we did last night was we voted for a King’s Speech which will do an enormous amount to lift children and other people out of poverty, and we voted against an amendment which criticised the Government for not having lifted the two-child cap after just 18 days.”
Asked about ending the cap, he said: “We were always clear that this is something we want to do, lifting kids out of poverty is what Labour governments do, it’s in our DNA.
“But we were also very clear in the election and very clear last night that that has to be paid for somehow and we know the public finances are an absolute mess, that is what we have been left by the Tories.
“So this is a question of fixing the public finances so we can begin to do the things we would like to do, like lifting the two-child cap.”
While he insisted Labour wants to axe it, “the question is one of affordability at the moment”.
“Everybody in the Labour Party is clear this is something we want to do,” he said.
“We expect it to be done as quickly as is possible, but it is contingent on getting the wider economy sorted out.
“I have faith this is a Government which will go the extra mile for these kids. I know myself and all the other Labour MPs I speak to are pushing the Government to do this as quickly as is possible.”
Mr McDougall was also clear that MPs “knew that to vote against the whip, there are always consequences”.
“It was a handful of MPs and they have been dealt with in the normal way,” Mr McDougall said.
Zarah Sultana, one of those who lost the whip, defended voting agains the government. She told the BBC’s Today programme: “I’m not interested in playing up to this macho virility test that seems to be what people are talking about.
“It’s about the material conditions of 330,000 children living in poverty.
“This isn’t a game. This is about people’s lives.”
She also told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “I slept well knowing that I took a stand against child poverty that is affecting 4.3 million people in this country and it is the right thing to do and I am glad I did it.”
READ MORE: Scottish economy success on FDI front - is everyone happy?
Kim Johnson, another Labour MP who tabled a similar amendment on scrapping the two-child benefit cap, which was not selected, said she voted with the government “for unity.”
She added: “The massive strength of feeling is undeniable. It must be a priority for our first budget.”
Former Labour MP Jonathan Ashworth defended the decision to remove the whip, saying it was no surprise that colleagues who failed to support the party's King's Speech in 14 years were disciplined.
He also accused the seven rebels of “gesture” politics, saying: “To join with the odds and sods, who are pretty impotent in Parliament, they knew there was no chance of this amendment passing.”
Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s Westminster leader, said that Labour had “failed its first major test in government”. He added: “Labour MPs had the opportunity to deliver meaningful change from years of Tory misrule by immediately lifting thousands of children out of poverty — they have made a political choice not to do so.
“This is now the Labour government’s two-child cap and it must take ownership of the damage it is causing, including the appalling levels of poverty in the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel