Two-thirds of residents in some of Scotland’s coastal communities fear a decline in the health of fisheries in the last two decades, a survey has found.
Research by Survation found that across Scotland, 40% of people think the health of the country’s fisheries has declined in the past 20 years.
But in coastal communities – including villages and towns such as Eyemouth, Fraserburgh, Kinlochbervie, Kirkcudbright, Lochinver, Oban, Portree, Stonehaven, Troon, Ullapool and Wick – that rose to 67%.
The research – which also found 86% believe the way Scotland’s fish populations are managed is important for the resilience and viability of coastal communities – was commissioned by the Our Seas Coalition and released as it launched a new multi-media exhibition aimed at showcasing the voices of people from coastal communities.
The Coastal Testimonies exhibition, which is launching in Eyemouth in the Borders before touring Scotland in the coming months, saw more than 60 people discuss their hopes for the future of the seas around Scotland.
Read More:
-
Ross accuses Lib Dems of misleading Scotland's fishermen over HPMAs
-
SNP table 'fisheries closures' and farm funds dependent on climate action
-
Scottish independence 'can't be worse' than current situation for fishing sector
Those who provided testimonies and who were photographed included commercial fishermen, sea anglers, politicians, naturalists, scientists, community groups, artists, and those with recreational interests in the sea – with each person speaking directly about their own connection to the water.
Ian McWhinney, a fisherman from Badachro in Wester Ross, spoke about whether any of his children will be able to follow him into the industry, saying: “In my lifetime, I have seen all sorts of inshore fisheries collapse.
“So unless we do something about it very soon, I find it very difficult that they’ll have a future in the fishing industry here because there won’t be a fishing industry left.”
Mariel ten Doeschate, a cetacean scientist from Inverness, told the project: “The future of our seas depend on how we act in the next couple of years, the decisions we’re going to make, and if we’re going to listen to the evidence and take the precautionary approach.
“I think that’s what’s going to make or break the difference really.”
Hayley Wolcott, co-ordinator of the Our Seas Coalition, which brings together more than 140 coastal businesses, community groups, fishermen’s associations and environmental organisations, said the project had been set up to “promote a better understanding of inshore environmental and fisheries issues” by using personal accounts to “inspire greater dialogue and action within communities”.
Ms Wolcott added: “The testimonies speak for themselves. It is moving to read the deep respect and understanding that people have for their seas.
“Our surveys suggest that concern about the condition of our ocean is actually already highest in coastal communities, because they are closest to the many issues facing our marine environment.
“However, coastal communities are often marginalised in decision-making. It is so important that decision-makers listen to the people living close to the sea, people in communities who see changes through the generations and want to see better political decisions.
“This project is all about empowering people within their communities to speak up, share their first-hand experiences and talk with each other about how to safeguard the precious interconnections between people and the life in our sea.
“We all rely upon the sea, but we have a duty to look after what provides for us.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here