A healthcare watchdog warned of concerns for patient safety during an inspection of one of Scotland’s largest hospitals.
Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) inspected the Glasgow Royal Infirmary emergency department on April 9 and found “significant patient safety concerns”.
The concerns sparked a second unannounced inspection on June 3-5 and this covered the whole hospital.
Donna Maclean, HIS chief inspector, said: “Our inspection of the emergency department at Glasgow Royal Infirmary identified patient safety concerns, and we returned to carry out a second unannounced hospital-wide inspection from June 3-5.
“We were assured that NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had responded promptly to the patient safety concerns highlighted during the initial inspection.”
READ MORE: Cancer drugs among new treatments made available on the NHS
No further details were provided on the nature of the safety concerns.
Ms Maclean added: “A full report, including the findings from the initial emergency department inspection, will be published in August 2024.”
The watchdog also carried out inspections of the emergency department at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in Glasgow on April 8 and a hospital-wide inspection of the Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) in Paisley on April 8-10.
Inspectors said in the morning of the visit to the QEUH the emergency department was “operating under significant pressure with an 11-hour wait for patients to be transferred to in-patient areas and a two-hour waiting time for first assessment by a clinician”.
No patients were being cared for in corridors – unlike in the RAH – but, in the afternoon, nine ambulances were waiting outside.
Inspectors reviewed incidents or adverse events in the three months prior to the inspection and found some relating to delays in triage and knock-on delays in patients having an initial electrocardiogram to measure heart activity.
Inspectors were told staff would be moved from other departments if triage delays increased; “see and treat” rooms were set up to cut delays in essential tests for patients in waiting rooms; and that, during the inspection, triage times were 15 minutes.
Inspectors said the QEUH emergency department was “calm and well led” adding that despite pressures “staff were focused on the provision of safe and compassionate care and patients were complimentary about their care and the staff providing it”.
Inspectors said RAH staff provided “safe and effective care in calm and well led areas”, with patients also “complimentary” about their care.
For those patients being cared for in the corridors, the hospital inspectors said they “appeared comfortable and had not been in the department for an extended period of time”.
Inspectors were told those waiting for a prolonged period would be transferred to a hospital bed for comfort but they did not see that happening during the inspection as the longest wait in the department then was seven hours.
Areas identified for improvement by HIS at both the RAH and QUEH included hand hygiene and safe storage of cleaning products.
An NHSGGC spokesperson said: “Following patient safety concerns being raised by HIS at the time of the emergency department inspection in April, a number of actions and improvements immediately took place assuring safe, quality care is in place and this remains our priority.
“A second visit was undertaken by HIS in early June and we look forward to receiving that report.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel