Nicola Sturgeon doesn't need to apologise for the SNP's general election defeat, according to an ousted MP.
Hannah Bardell also said mudslinging from within the party is unhelpful as she appealed to the party to "pull together".
Ms Bardell lost her Livingston seat to Labour's Gregor Poynton having first been elected for the constituency since 2015.
She was one of dozens who were defeated as the party's numbers at Westminster plunged from 48 to just nine.
READ MORE: 'Too close to Sturgeon': John Swinney faces calls to resign
The SNP lost all six of its Glasgow seats and the three it represented it Edinburgh as voters switched to a resurgent Labour party which wo 37 seats - up from one in the 2019 election.
Edinburgh South West MP Joanna Cherry was among the 39 SNP MPs who lost her seat in Thursday's rout - and claimed former First Minister Ms Sturgeon owed the party an apology for her role in the defeat.
But Ms Bardell told LBC she did not agree.
READ MORE: Flynn: SNP's 'internal difficulties' led to loss of trust
READ MORE: After the tears, what now for the SNP and independence?
"No I don't actually [agree with that]. I have no doubt there'll be lots of reflections on what's happened and how challenging that's been," she said.
"And I think that some of the media have been vitriolic about and against Nicola and I'm not saying that there have not been mistakes made, stuff that she's said herself.
"But I don't think you can put it all at any one person's door and I also don't think that's very helpful.
"I genuinely think there's an opportunity for us to come together as a party as John Swinney has tried to do. We recognise there are issues, and differences of opinion and different views, and that will and has always been the case and it is the case in every political party.
"I just don't think that kind of stuff is particularly helpful and I think what our members want to see is us pulling together and looking at the areas of agreement which is most definitely on independence and how we forge forward with that.
"We've had a tough time as a party and I don't think that, sort of the, bloodletting and the mudslinging that it is happening - and it'll be happening in all different quarters - is necessarily the most helpful thing. We have to listen to the electorate, but we also have to communicate with them."
The outgoing Livingston MP said it was a "massive blow" to lose her seat and "devastating" to longer be serving her constituents in the same way.
But said she has a slight sense of relief to be further out of UK politics for now which she described as "pretty toxic".
She said: "Of course there is (some relief), without question. I mean when Sir David Amess was murdered, my brother came to me and he said, look, I think you might need to think about another job, another career. We're so worried about you. We're so worried about the atmosphere.
"You know, I've got panic buttons in my house like every MP has and I've got - compared to probably some very high profile ones - minimal security.
"The way that we have to live our life now as MPs is not, I think, what we would like it to be and I think we all have to think about that.
"And yes on a personal level there is a little bit of relief that I will be hopefully safer and not be facing some of those threats that I have in the past because it has absolutely taken a toll.
"I don't know what's next, but one thing I'm very clear about is I want to keep talking about the atmosphere in politics."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel