Former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson has branded her own party’s campaign “tawdry” and a “shit show” over alleged bets placed on the election date.
The Gambling Commission is looking into two Tory candidates over alleged wagers on the date of the 4 July election.
Speaking on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast with Sky News political editor Beth Rigby and former broadcaster and presenter Carol Vorderman, Ms Davidson waded into the fallout of the alleged betting scandal.
READ MORE: Sunak aide placed bet on date of election days before announcement
"What an absolute shit show. Firstly, I mean, how tawdry is it?" she said.
She described it as akin to "insider trading" and criticised Rishi Sunak's response, saying he had repeatedly failed to get out in front and take control of events.
Speaking on the podcast, Ms Vorderman added: "The Tory party as they stand is just sleazy, it's grubby.
"From outside the Westminster bubble, whatever Sunak says, people now openly laugh at Tory politicians whenever they're out of your studio Beth.
"Whenever they're in front of an audience they don't command any respect whatsoever."
READ MORE: Our cartoonist Steven Camley’s take on betting scandal
Tory candidates Craig Williams and Laura Saunders are both under investigation. Ms Saunders is married to the party's director of campaigns Tony Lee.
It also emerged this week that one of Mr Sunak's close protection police officers has been arrested over alleged bets on the timing of the election as well.
During a leader's event on BBC Question Time, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he was "incredibly angry" to learn of the allegations and said if anyone had broken the rules "they should face the full force of the law".
However, he refused to suspend the candidates while the investigations were ongoing.
It comes as the election campaigns approach the last two weeks before the country heads to the polls.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel