Cabinet minister Grant Shapps has appeared to concede defeat for the Conservatives saying his party were fighting to prevent Sir Keir Starmer's Labour securing a "supermajority" bigger even than the 1997 landslide.
The Defence Secretary told Times Radio the Tories were still fighting for every seat and "the polls have been wrong before".
But he said to ensure proper accountability "you don't want to have somebody receive a supermajority" along the line of Tony Blair's in 1997 as he reinstated his party's stance that Labour would increase taxes for people by £2000 a year - a claim party leader Sir Keir Starmer has denied.
Mr Shapps said: "In this case, of course, the concern would be that if Keir Starmer were to go into No 10 - it will either be Rishi Sunak, or Keir Starmer there's no other outcomes to this election - and that power was in some way unchecked, it would be very bad news for people in this country.
READ MORE: Flynn: We will hold referendum in five years if SNP win
"A blank cheque approach allowing someone to do anything they wanted, particularly when their particular set of plans are so vague, and they say 'change', but you have no idea what they actually want to change to, other than the fact that they've outlined plans which would cost £2,094 to every working family in this country."
He added: "It's perfectly legitimate to say the country doesn't function well when you get majorities the size of Blair's or even bigger and we would say there are a lot of very good, hardworking MPs who can hold the government of the day to account and we'd say those are Conservative MPs."
The SNP candidate for West Dunbartonshire, Martin Docherty-Hughes said: "Grant Shapps has confirmed what the SNP has been saying for quite some time now: the Tories are toast. This is no longer an election, it's a coronation.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland debate: Leaders clash on independence
READ MORE: BBC Scotland debate: Key exchanges as party leaders clash
"The real choice now for Scottish voters is who is best placed to represent their values and interests, and who will stand up for them at Westminster when £18 billion of public service cuts come hurtling down the line.
"The real choice is whether we give Sir Keir Starmer a free pass to impose more public service cuts, or whether we have a strong Scottish voice there to stop him. The Labour Party will always put the Westminster status quo before Scotland, and they'll have no reason to change that habit with a huge majority. Scotland needs a party who always puts our interests first, and that's what the SNP will always do.
"On the 4th of July, vote SNP to reject Westminster austerity plans, put Scotland's interests first, and help build a future made in Scotland, for Scotland."
Later, Rishi Sunak insisted he had "absolutely not" lost hope of winning the General Election and was still fighting to win.
The Prime Minister warned against giving Sir Keir Starmer a "blank cheque" if he won power, but stressed that he was still hopeful of victory pointing to pledges made in his party's manifesto unveiled yesterday.
Asked by journalists if the change in tone showed the Tories had conceded defeat, the Prime Minister said: "No absolutely not. What you saw yesterday is we've put a manifesto forward which has got a very clear set of tax cuts for the country tax cuts at every stage of your life.
"Whether you're working or setting up a small business, tax cuts when you're trying to buy your first home, tax cut for pensioners, and tax cuts for families.
"And I'm really energised to now have a chance to put a very clear plan to the country and talk about all the things I want to do."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here