Labour and the SNP have clashed over North Sea jobs, with Stephen Flynn repeating his claim that Sir Keir Starmer’s windfall tax extension will see thousands out of work.
But Shadow Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said John Swinney’s party were “all over the place”.
The energy sector has become one of the key battlegrounds in the July 4 vote. More details of Labour's plans for the future of industry are expected on Thursday when the party publishes its manifesto.
The Unite union has already refused to endorse the prospectus, partly because of the party's position on the transition away from oil and gas.
READ MORE: SNP under fire for 'exaggerated' oil jobs claims
Labour has vowed to create GB Energy.
The details on exactly what it will do are scant, but it will be funded with £8.3billion from investment raised from what the party has described as a “proper” windfall tax on energy firms.
This would see the government’s existing windfall tax hiked from 75 to 78% and the scrapping of the current investment allowance which allows producers get 91p in tax relief for every £1 they invest.
Speaking to the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Mr Flynn said Labour’s plans would not reduce energy bills but fund “nuclear power projects in England".
He said the SNP believed i a “just and sustainable transition that protects the future employment of the tens of thousands of people” who live in the north east and work in the industry.
“Now, the reality is that this election there was three options on the table, that just and sustainable transition that protects workers and creates new net zero jobs of tomorrow.
“Thre's the Labour Party position which of course would scrap 100,000 jobs and wouldn't invest in that net zero future because they've rolled back on their £28 billion net zero commitment.
“And then, of course, there's the Conservative Party position, which is to act like oil and gas will last forever when it won't. They're almost becoming climate deniers like Nigel Farage.”
Responding to the interview, Labour’s Ian Murray said: "The SNP has zero credibility on the economy and are all over the place when it comes to energy jobs and security.
"Stephen Flynn thinks a nurse on £29,000 a year should pay more tax but the oil and gas giants taking in billions of pounds in profits shouldn’t. That’s nonsense from a party that can’t give a straight answer on oil and gas.
"Labour will establish GB energy in Scotland to create the jobs for the future while cutting energy bills and transforming Scotland into a clean energy superpower."
Labour's manifesto was finalised behind closed doors at a secretive meeting on Friday.
Unite has not spoken publicly about the decision not to endorse the manifesto.
Sources told the media that there were concerns over worker rights, as well as oil and gas jobs.
The union, which donated £3 million to Labour’s campaign in 2019, warned last year that there were “no blank cheques” for the party as it urged the leadership to offer “bolder” policies.
READ MORE: Swinney: SNP will work with Labour government
Speaking to Sky News, Labour shadow justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “Unite have some areas of policy where they would probably want us to go further but they did not push any of those issues to a vote.”
She added: “(Unite) recognise that actually change is coming, the issue is speed and transition on which we were able to provide assurances on plans that have been backed by independent experts.
“We will create over 100,000 jobs as part of our plans. These are good quality jobs in the same sector.”
Asked if the Unite leadership had confidence in those assurances, Ms Mahmood said: “That’s a matter for Unite and their own internal management of their union.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel