The Scottish Government has been accused of "taking a step in the wrong direction" after slashing funding for community buyouts.
This year's allocation for the Scottish Land Fund is £7.1 million, a drop of £3.9m on the previous year.
The SNP government had aimed to have the fund sitting at £20m annually by 2026.
It was set up in 2000 and three years later the Land Reform (Scotland) Act introduced rights for communities to purchase land.
The initial fund was £10m and this was later increased to £15m. By June 2005, the SLF had assisted roughly 200 communities.
Campaigners said the cut comes at a "particularly unfortunate" time when there is huge interest from communities in acquiring land but they are coming up against "hugely inflated" land prices.
The government said it remains committed to doubling the £11m fund, which is administered by the National Lottery and HIE, and said it is exploring opportunities for further in-year funding.
Dr Josh Doble, policy manager at Community Land Scotland, said it was disappointed by the "substantial" cut in government assistance.
He said: "Communities applying to the SLF have to go through a rigorous process to access funds and if successful have proven that they deliver excellent value for money in terms of fostering economic and social development around Scotland.
"This comes at a particularly unfortunate time as community ambitions for buying land and buildings are higher than ever, yet communities are coming up against vastly inflated land prices.
"We welcome the Scottish Government’s continued commitment to the Land Fund being £20m by the end of this Parliament.
"We also hope that the Land Reform Bill currently in Parliament can be sufficiently strengthened so that land prices can be kept proportionate and communities are empowered to intervene more readily in the land market.
The SLF has been underspent in recent years by about £3m but campaigners say the main reason for this is "big price rises driven by big absentee investments".
"It is true that the Scottish Land Fund has not spent its full budget in the last few years," said Dr Doble.
"But that is mainly due to the huge rise in land prices across much of Scotland which has pushed possible purchases out of reach of communities.
"There are many cases where potential buyouts won't get off the ground because the land has become more expensive.
"Any decrease in the Land Fund budget may only add to that circle of stalemate."
READ MORE:
Gigha holiday cottage operator sought by island trust
Much-needed helipad to be built on Hebridean isle
Notable community buyouts since the fund was set up have included the purchase of the island of Gigha, off the west coast of Kintyre.
The island was owned by private landlords until 2002, then Derek Holt, the last private owner, sold the island to the residents for £4.15m.
The population had peaked at over 700 in the 18th century, but during the 20th century the island had numerous owners, which caused various problems in developing the island.
By the beginning of the 21st century the population had fallen to 98.
The community buyout is said to have transformed the island, which now has a growing population and a variety of new commercial activities to complement farming and tourism. A day of celebration making the buyout is held every year.
A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: “Ministers have already allocated £7.1m to the fund for 2024/25, remain fully committed to the doubling of the fund, and are examining opportunities for further in-year funding as the budgetary situation develops.
"This will help even more communities have a say in how land is managed in their area.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel