Former Conservative Government Minister David Duguid has said the decision to replace him with Douglas Ross as a candidate for Westminster “wasn’t his decision”.
Mr Duguid, who was taken into hospital in April, insisted in a post on social media that claims he is “unable to stand” due to ill health are “simply incorrect”.
Douglas Ross has defended his decision to run in the General Election in Mr Duguid’s place, saying his party colleague’s health was at the “heart” of the decision to replace him.
Mr Ross is part of the Scottish Conservative management board, which ruled that Mr Duguid is not medically well enough to stand for the party in the Aberdeenshire North and Moray East seat.
But Mr Duguid, who was taken into hospital in April, insisted in a post on social media that claims he is to unwell to campaign were not true, and that no one from his party had even spoken to doctors before the decision was made.
Instead, he said it was the party management board “that decided not to allow me to be the candidate, although none of them had visited me”.
He wrote: “They apparently took this decision based on two visits from the party director and without receiving any professional medical prognosis.”
READ MORE: Tory grassroot anger over Douglas Ross Westminster bid
The former MP – who will not be eligible for a redundancy payment from Parliament – added he is “very saddened by the way this whole episode has unfolded”.
Rival parties claimed Mr Ross had “betrayed” a colleague by putting himself forward to stand in the seat – a decision which came after he previously said he would quit Westminster to focus on Holyrood and his post as leader of the Scottish Conservatives.
— David Duguid (@david_duguid) June 7, 2024
Scottish Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes branded Mr Ross’s behaviour as being “straight out of the Farage playbook”, while Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said it showed there is “no promise flip-flop Ross won’t break”.
Mr Ross said the “very unique circumstances” and timings meant the party had just over 24 hours to get another candidate in place, so he decided to put himself forward.
He told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Friday that boundary changes mean a part of the seat includes his former Moray constituency, which he has represented in the UK Parliament since 2017.
He added: “I want to lead from the front, this is a really important seat.
“It’s one of the many key seats across Scotland where it is a straight choice between the Scottish Conservatives and the SNP.”
He said Mr Duguid had been an “absolute champion” for the area and the Conservative party management board had had a “difficult decision” to make.
Mr Ross said: “The party management board had to look at the situation right now, the situation with David’s health, his recovery, that was at the heart of the decision the management board took.
“It was a very difficult decision, and I understand how difficult it has been for David, for his family, for his staff. I have been in touch with his office.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross announces surprise bid to stand at General Election
Asked if he has spoken to Mr Duguid since he put himself forward for the seat, Mr Ross said he had “reached out” to him, adding that “he will maybe speak when he is able to and he feels able to speak”.
Pressed on whether he had messaged Mr Duguid or tried to speak to him, Mr Ross added: “We have done both, but given he is in hospital it is not straightforward.
“I have been in conversation with David’s office and such like, relaying as much support as we can.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel