Nicola Sturgeon expected a “Stalinist adherence to the leadership line” on gender issues, one of the party’s most senior MPs has said.
Joanna Cherry said many activists and members were “very unhappy” about the former first minister’s position but were “afraid to say so.”
The comments were made in The National and in a new book of essays by gender critical women.
READ MORE: Starmer to unveil 'doorstep offer' to Scottish voters
In The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht, published on Thursday, Ms Cherry recounts her sacking from the SNP front bench in 2021.
At the time, the then Westminster leader of the group, Ian Blackford, said she had been demoted because of her “unacceptable behaviour.”
He never explained what this meant, but his decision came a week after members of Out for Independence, the official LGBT wing of the SNP, criticised Ms Cherry for defending a gender critical activist on social media.
Ms Cherry was also a prominent critic of the Scottish Government’s ultimately doomed plan to reform gender recognition laws.
In the National, the MP said “gender identity” ideology - that anyone should be able to self-identify as whatever gender they wish and have that legally recognised - has “taken root in public institutions not just in Scotland but across the United Kingdom including our police, our prosecution service, our courts, our prisons, our schools, colleges and universities, our political parties, and our Parliament.”
She said women had been called “hateful” for questioning this.
“Accusations of transphobia have been used to silence perfectly reasonable concerns, women have been removed from social media platforms, had websites and social media forums shut down, been bullied, and harassed at work, lost jobs and even been arrested, questioned and prosecuted for speech that was perfectly lawful.”
Ms Cherry said she was “demonised, ostracised, bullied, and harassed for speaking up for the rights of women.”
She wrote: “People sometimes ask me why I have stayed in the SNP despite this treatment. The answer is quite simple. Firstly, one should never give in to bullies. Secondly, the SNP was founded by intellectuals, artists, poets and thinkers.
“The lack of debate and the Stalinist adherence to the leadership line which was expected in the Sturgeon years would have been anathema to them.
“Thirdly, I knew that this ideology had been adopted without any proper debate or discussion in the party and that many activists and members were very unhappy about it, although they were afraid to say so.”
MSPs backed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill in December 2022 by 86 votes to 39 on a cross-party basis.
The legislation was supposed to speed up and simplify the process for a trans person to obtain a gender recognition certificate and change their legal sex.
Under the current system, this takes at least two years, involves a medical diagnosis and is only available at 18.
Holyrood’s Bill would have cut the waiting time to six months, lowered the age threshold to 16, and, crucially, scrapped the need for medical diagnosis, known as self-ID.
Before the prospective law could be given Royal Assent, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack blocked it by using powers granted to him under Section 35 of the 1998 Scotland Act.
It was the first time in the history of devolution that the power had been used.
He argued that although the subject matter was within Holyrood’s powers, the Bill would harm the operation of UK-wide equality law.
READ MORE: Shirley Anne-Somerville confirms government will not appeal Section 35
In the book, Ms Cherry says the Gender Recognition Reform Bill “is a microcosm of everything that was wrong with the SNP under its previous leadership.”
She added: “A controversial, ill-thought-through policy that was never debated on the floor of conference, a refusal to listen to those with legitimate concerns, the demonisation of dissenters and, above all, as the opinion polls show, a failure to take the public with us.
“Humza Yousaf is to be commended for doing the right thing by not pursuing an appeal that could never be won.
“Lessons must be learned, not just by my party, but by all the political parties in Scotland who preferred shallow virtue-signalling to evidence-based policy-making.”
The SNP has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel