The SNP and the Lib Dems could be squeezed out of one of the main televised leadership debates in the run-up to the General Election.
ITV is reportedly working on a format that would include only the leaders of the Labour and Conservative parties.
One source at the broadcaster told the Guardian, this was one of the conditions laid down by Sir Keir Starmer’s party.
The SNP’s Depute Leader Keith Brown accused Labour of “running scared.”
“It is vital that Starmer confirms he will take part in TV debates which include the SNP and other main parties,” he said.
“Continued austerity and policies like the two-child cap, Brexit, the House of Lords, further NHS privatisation, and a rollback on climate commitments are all policies Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour are gleefully supporting in this campaign - proving they offer no real change at all.
“That’s why they are so happy to attempt to exclude the SNP from the conversation, but we won’t be shut down by Labour running scared - we have a positive vision for Scotland with progressive policies that will deliver for people across Scotland.”
READ MORE: Starmer appeals to independence supporters with promise of 'change'
Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville Roberts said the election was "not a two-horse race" and has written to both Labour and the Tories challenging them to a debate in Wales against her party leader, Rhun ap Iorwerth.
There have been clashes over this before.
In 2019, the SNP and Lib Dems took ITV to court over a head-to-head debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn. They argued Jo Swinson and Nicola Sturgeon should be included.
However, two senior judges ruled that because ITV was not exercising “a public function” it was not liable to judicial review challenge in the courts. The format was an editorial matter for broadcasters and the media regulator Ofcom.
Labour has so far indicated it will only put Sir Keir up for two leadership debates during the campaign. Rishi Sunak has proposed six - one a week.
Sir Keir told Sky News: “He is sounding increasingly desperate, I have to say.”
The Labour leader added: “Of course there are going to be TV debates. They are part and parcel of the election cycle now.
“I obviously want to spend as much of my time talking to voters directly.
“I can do a hundred debates with Rishi Sunak, but I know what he is going to say, he is going to say everything is fine, the cost-of-living crisis is over, the health service hasn’t got any problems.
“That is all he ever says.”
Meanwhile, in other election news, Jeremy Corbyn has confirmed he will stand as an independent in Islington North.
“When I was first elected, I made a promise to stand by my constituents no matter what. In Islington North, we keep our promises,” he said.
However, Sir David Evennett, the MP for Bexleyheath and Crayford in east London since 2005, has announced that he is standing down.
He is the 76th Tory MP to announce that they will not seek re-election, surpassing the number who stood down before the 1997 election.
Rishi Sunak was in Belfast yesterday, where he visited the Titanic museum.
Former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson mocked the Prime Minister for “a site visit to something famous for sinking.”
“Is there a double agent in CCHQ, and were they a headline writer in a previous life?,” she tweeted. “Our candidates deserve better.”
The deluge launch drowned out by D:Ream.
— Ruth Davidson (@RuthDavidsonPC) May 24, 2024
A brewery visit with a teetotal PM, so no chance of a piss up.
Now a site visit to something famous for sinking.
Is there a double agent in CCHQ, and were they a headline writer in a previous life? 🤦♀️
Our candidates deserve better. https://t.co/efMtKBL5Qd
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel