A plan to build a new secondary school on the site of a local park has sparked a furious response from residents.
A new Lenzie Academy, which will replace the current building which has stood since 1960, replacing the old building on Kirkintilloch Road, has been in the works for several years.
East Dunbartonshire Council has been allocated funding from the Scottish Government to build a new school for 1,400 pupils on the site of Whitegates Park in Lenzie which was identified as the preferred site in September 2022.
The project is expected to cost £85million, with a target of opening to pupils no later than December 2027.
However, the proposal to build the school on the site of one of only two neighbourhood parks has been met with anger.
Read More:
-
Glasgow teacher cuts: probationers to be used in response to staffing concerns
-
'Significant doubt' over future of Aberdeen University as cuts, migration policy bite
-
Why schools in Scotland needs teachers out of the classroom
Those campaigning to save the park have raised a number of issues with the proposed development.
In 2018 a feasibility study was carried out to explore the possibility of building an ASN school on the site.
It identified a number of issues with the Whitegates proposal, including the presence of toxic and phytotoxic contamination.
The report stated that "harmful gas emissions could be present at high concentrations" and that the area is "located within an area with a potential maximum radon of 5-10%".
It indicated that there were toxic exceedances of lead, nickel, benz(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)flouranthene, and dibenze(a,h)anthracene.
East Dunbartonshire Council said: "There will be a new intrusive Ground Investigation survey undertaken as part of the Lenzie Academy project that will inform the design and will be independently assessed as part of the planning application for the project."
The feasibility study further found that a range of bird species "of conservation concern" including the willow warbler, mistle thrush and dunnoch.
There was also potential habitat for other species of conservation concern including the house sparrow, starling and tawny owl as well as at least 24 trees with bat roost potential.
The study also stated that the pond had "good habitat potential" for water vole, though no signs were detected.
East Dunbartonshire Council said: "The relevant ecology surveys continue to be undertaken on site and will inform detailed proposals to address issues such as ecological impact and biodiversity.
"Once complete these surveys will be independently assessed through the planning application process."
A petition to save the park has attracted more than 2,000 signatures, with the 2022 feasibility report noting that one of the challenges associated with the site would be the loss of a place which is "beneficial for the community to access nature".
The plans are currently in a statutory consultation period which will run until Wednesday June 19.
Local resident Wendy Maguire said: "Our children deserve the best site for their new Lenzie Academy. East Dunbartonshire’s preferred site, Whitegates park, is clearly not the best place to build a school.
"Restricted parking and access from the main road, flooding and toxic soil contamination mean we need to look again at the alternatives.
"This park, with its mature woodland and wildlife, plays a vital role in our community. East Dunbartonshire Council refers to Whitegates park as an asset - it is, and it’s one that should remain for generations to enjoy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel