John Swinney has ruled out gender recognition reform legislation, saying it is beyond the powers of his devolved administration.
The First Minister told Sky News that his government “quite simply can’t proceed with it.”
MSPs passed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill (GRR) in December 2022 by 86 votes to 39 on a cross-party basis.
However, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack used powers given to him by the Scotland Act to stop the law gaining royal assent.
READ MORE: Proportion of Scots teachers facing weekly class violence quadruples
The legislation was supposed to speed up and simplify the process for a trans person to obtain a gender recognition certificate and change their legal sex.
Under the current system, this takes at least two years, involves a medical diagnosis and is only available for those aged 18 and above.
Holyrood’s Bill would have cut the waiting time to six months, scrapped the need for medical diagnosis and lowered the age threshold to 16.
Mr Jack blocked it by using the first-ever order under Section 35 of the 1998 Scotland Act.
He argued that although the subject matter was within Holyrood’s powers, the Bill would have an adverse effect on the operation of UK-wide equality law.
Humza Yousaf went to the Court of Session asking them to look at the decision, but Lady Haldane comprehensively rejected the Scottish Government’s arguments and said there was nothing to lead her to conclude that Mr Jack had acted unreasonably or unlawfully.
A possible appeal, which could have seen the case go next to the Inner House of the Court of Session and then potentially to the UK Supreme Court, was abandoned in December last year.
In an interview with Sky News, Mr Swinney wrongly claimed that it was the Supreme Court who had ruled that the gender reform legislation could not be processed, rather than the court of session. He made the same mistake in an interview with the BBC on Wednesday.
He said: “The reality of the situation we face is that the Supreme Court [sic] has said that we can’t legislate in that area.
“We can’t take forward that legislation. I accept the rule of law and that’s the position we find ourselves in, that we cannot proceed with that legislation.
“But I think what’s the most important thing that I can say is that to LGBT people in our society, the Scottish Government is on their side, we have been on their side and we will be on their side in the years to come.”
Asked if he would abandon the Bill, he said: “We quite simply can’t proceed with it. It’s legislation that can’t be implemented, so we cannot take that forward.”
READ MORE: Glasgow School of Art admits insurance row fuels Mack rebuild 'inertia'
The comments come amid a backlash from the SNP's LGBTQ wing, Out For Independence, over the appointment of Kate Forbes as Deputy First Minister.
They are seeking an urgent meeting with Mr Swinney and Ms Forbes.
The Scottish Greens have also criticised the appointment, claiming that the government is taking Scotland “back to the 1950s.”
Speaking to journalists in parliament yesterday Ms Forbes insisted she and the First Minister would ‘serve all communities in Scotland as we further and progress the rights of every community in Scotland”
In his interview with Sky News, Mr Swinney said he had not discussed abandoning the Gender Recognition Reform Bill with Ms Forbes when appointing her as his deputy.
He said the “reality of the situation” was that the courts had ruled they were unable to proceed with it.
Mr Swinney also insisted his administration was “on the side” of LGBT people.
He said: “The protection of the rights of LGBT individuals in our society is absolutely fundamental to my government – the protection of those rights and the enhancement of those rights.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel