Scotland's publicly funded official heritage and conservation agency has come under fire over a failure to clearly support an end to the 20 months of inertia over the rebuild of a national treasure which has been described as a "scandal" that will add millions to its estimated cost of more than £100m.
Historic Environment Scotland had been urged to articulate its position over the future of the iconic Category A-listed Glasgow School of Art Mackintosh building after the Herald series revealed how attempts at the reinstatement of the masterpiece originally designed by renowned Scots architect Charles Rennie Mackintosh have stalled and serious questions raised about whether the restoration will ever happen.
But they have remained non-committal about having any involvement after being quizzed by Professor Alan Dunlop, one of Scotland's leading architects who once put his hat in the ring to become the next chair of the GSA and is a stakeholder consultee for the project. And it rejected any involvement in supporting the project financially.
A June 2018 fire destroyed the building as it neared the end of a multi-million pound restoration project following an earlier blaze in May 2014.
While a design team was supposed to have been in place, according to the GSA itinerary, by August 2022 - that still has not happened with hopes of getting any council planning approval for the project not expected until the spring of 2026 the earliest, according to estimates based on the GSA's own schedule.
It was confirmed at the end of March, that no new architect procurement process was currently being undertaken nor had any new timescale for this been defined. According to the school's project itinerary, that process alone is expected to take four months.
Funding arrangements had still not been confirmed and neither the Scottish nor UK Governments have been approached to date by the GSA in any bid to secure funds to cover the capital costs of any restoration. The business case schedule talked of confirming funding arrangements in April 2022.
And no steps have yet been taken to appoint a main contractor for the reinstatement of one of Scotland's most internationally renowned landmarks.
An original GSA risk management analysis categorised a delay of more than six months with the project as "catastrophic".
A contrast was made with the work done on the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, which was severely damaged by a blaze in 2019 and is scheduled to reopen at the end of this year.
Mr Dunlop who has been pushing for an end to the inertia sought action from HES having approached its chief executive Alex Paterson with articles from the Herald's series about the future of the building.
He asked: "Given that the Mackintosh School of Art was probably Scotland's most important work of architecture and of international renown, does HES have a view on the future of the rebuilding?"
READ MORE: Lachlan Goudie: ScotGov must intervene over School of Art fails
Glasgow School of Art: We 'appreciate' concern over future of Mack
Glasgow School of Art: students and politicians recall the 2014 fire
'A scandal': 19 months of 'inertia' over the rebuild of a Scottish national treasure
Glasgow School of Art: Insurance claim fuels Mack rebuild 'inertia'
GSA raised over £100m from insurance and fundraising after Mack fires
Its director of heritage Elizabeth McCrone responded: "We’re consulted by local authorities about works to A and B-listed buildings. As we’ll be a statutory consultee for listed building consent applications coming forward for the building, we’ll provide advice to the local authority, who are the decision-maker, when they ask us for our input."
He also asked that about issues surrounding funding for a faithful reinstatement and whether HES would be contributing to any rescue bid.
The response from Ms McCrone was a 'no'.
"Funding for our grants comes from Grant in Aid received from the Scottish Government and so our grants are considered public funding," she said.
"Conservation projects we can support focus on the repair of historic fabric in favour of reinstatement work, and so the proposed reinstatement of the School of Art building would not be something that we could directly financially support.
"Given the proposed traditional nature of the work there may be additional areas of activity which we may be able to support, such as training in traditional skills or community engagement with heritage. Project activities of this nature would need to meet our grants priorities and would be assessed using our competitive application process.
"Should the project team be interested in discussing this they can submit an Expression of Interest..."
Mr Dunlop said he was "disappointed" by the response saying: "HES are not committing to anything that could direct or determine the future of the building..."
He said: "They won't commit their opinion on the direction the project should take, sadly what I expected.
"I believe Historic Environment Scotland should be clearer and more forthright in their opinions regarding the future of the GSA particularly regarding reinstatement and replication, which would not be possible today without in my view massive compromises to the original Mackintosh design.
"They are after all the main conservation advisory body."
One of the issues understood to have put a spanner in the works is a botched process for procuring architects to design the project.
The search to lead the project was canned in March, last year in advance of a reset that has never happened.
Architects John McAslan + Partners were the original top scorers in the bid to oversee the rebuild. But it was then awarded to another firm, understood to be Hawkins\Brown after a recalculation.
Prominent architects and painters have expressed despair at the lack of action and believe government should be stepping in to ensure that Scotland retains the the Charles Rennie Mackintosh legacy.
The art school’s business plan envisages a “fundable and affordable” reconstruction project over a timeline of around five years.
Muriel Gray, the first female chair of the board of governors at the GSA, said five-and-a-half years ago, three months after the 2018 fire that people argued that a rebuild would take "anywhere between four and seven years" but that it would "depend on insurance money, getting the right people in place to do it, building regulations, all the standard technical and financial stuff".
An HES spokesman said: “As outlined in our response to Mr Dunlop, as a statutory consultee in the planning system we will be consulted on plans for the art school once these have been developed, and will be happy to provide advice once we have a proposal to comment on."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel