A pensioner has praised an optician whose examination he believes saved his life.
William Rolls, known as Billy to locals in his home town of Coatbridge, decided to visit his GP last year after experiencing persistent headaches and double vision.
The 73-year-old, a well-known figure in football refereeing circles around the town, was told his symptoms could be the result of sinus issues.
But when the married father-of-two’s condition worsened, he asked his local Specsavers if they could bring forward a prearranged appointment to get a second opinion – a move Mr Rolls believes saved his life.
Optometrist Luke McGregor carried out a number of examinations, then left the room to speak to the store director, at which point Mr Rolls began to fear something was seriously wrong.
READ MORE: Edinburgh dad running marathon for charity who helped daughter's rare eye condition
Mr McGregor then returned with a signed letter for urgent referral for the grandfather-of-three to University Hospital Monklands Accident and Emergency department.
On arrival, he said staff carried out an MRI scan which revealed a small burst blood vessel on the right-hand side of his head and neck caused by extremely high blood pressure.
The team prescribed Mr Rolls stronger medication for his blood pressure and recommended that he stay in hospital for a few days to allow them to monitor any changes.
Mr Rolls said his story demonstrated the critical role optometrists could play in detecting life-threatening conditions and urged everyone to book regular eye check-ups.
“It saved my life and could save yours,” said Mr Rolls, whose vision has since been largely restored after being prescribed specialised glasses.
“I have such deep gratitude to Luke and the entire Specsavers team for giving me more time to spend with my family and friends.
“I can’t thank them enough.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here