Labour will push ahead with a vote of no confidence in the Scottish Government, despite the resignation of Humza Yousaf.
MSPs will debate the motion tabled by Anas Sarwar on Wednesday. If it is backed by a simple majority in the chamber, then the First Minister and all of his ministers will need to resign.
However, the Greens have said that they will not support what they described as "parliamentary game playing" which means it will fail.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Conservatives have withdrawn their motion of no-confidence in Mr Yousaf, saying there is “no longer any need” given the First Minister’s planned resignation.
READ MORE: Swinney and Forbes considering bids for SNP leadership
Speaking on BBC Good Morning Scotland, the party's leader, Anas Sarwar said: “The principle of our motion still stands."
He added: “I don’t believe the SNP can give a stable, competent government - it is unleadable and ungovernable, and that is why we need a change of government.
“When Rishi Sunak took over [as Prime Minister] from Liz Truss, Nicola Sturgeon said the door of Downing Street was not a revolving door or a plaything of one party and the same applies here.”
If a majority of MSPs back Scottish Labour’s motion the First Minister and his ministers will need to resign.
Holyrood would then have 28 days to agree on a new administration. If that did not happen, then there would be an extraordinary election.
Mr Sarwar said he was “ready” for a vote: “I will take it tomorrow - we have the right priorities and we are ready to go both financially and our campaign machine.”
READ MORE: SNP leadership contest nominations open until 6 May
Green MSP Gillian Mackay said: “Like the withdrawn Tory motion, the Labour one has clearly been overtaken by events. Pursuing it would achieve nothing, and would simply mean more parliamentary game playing.
“Labour MSPs have spent the last few days saying the government needs to get back to running the country, so why do they want to waste the valuable time of the Scottish Parliament, staff and MSPs by carrying on with this charade when it has no chance of passing?
Ms Mackay added: “We bear no personal animosity to the First Minister or the SNP, and, as Scottish Greens, are already getting back to business.
“At the same time, we are proud to be welcoming hundreds of new Scottish Green members who care deeply about our climate, equalities and the fairer, greener society that we can build in an independent Scotland.”
Meanwhile, in a statement, Douglas Ross said the Tories had formally withdrawn their confidence motion.
He said: “I’m delighted that the Scottish Conservative motion of no confidence in Humza Yousaf achieved its purpose by forcing him to resign.
“While, on a personal level, I wish him well for the future, he was a disaster as First Minister and it’s in Scotland’s interests that he goes."
READ MORE: Kate Forbes receives 'groundswell of support' for SNP leadership bid
“The next goal for my party is to see off this feuding, failing SNP government and switch the focus away from their independence obsession and on to the public’s real priorities – such as growing the economy and improving Scotland’s ailing public services.
“As it’s job done in terms of Humza Yousaf, there’s no longer any need for us to press ahead with a debate on our no-confidence motion.
“Consequently, we have formally withdrawn it and requested that the parliamentary bureau instead allocate that time for a statement from the Lord Advocate on the Post Office scandal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel