Humza Yousaf has dismissed Alex Salmond’s “fantasy” demand for a pro-independence electoral pact as the price for Alba backing the beleaguered First Minister.
The rejection of the ultimatum could prove fatal to the SNP leader’s chances of surviving this week's confidence votes.
His leadership has been in turmoil ever since the shock termination of the powersharing deal between the SNP and Scottish Greens on Thursday.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf defiant as future hangs in the balance
There are two motions of no confidence to be voted on by MSPs.
The first, tabled by the Scottish Conservatives, is on Mr Yousaf as First Minister, and the second, tabled by Scottish Labour, is on the Scottish Government.
While losing the first would be politically difficult for the First Minister, losing the second would - as per the Scotland Act - require Mr Yousaf and all of his ministers to resign.
Both confidence votes only require a simple majority.
The SNP has 63 MSPs. However, the opposition parties have a combined total of 64.
All parties bar Alba have so far said they will back Douglas Ross’s motion on Mr Yousaf’s record.
So far only the Tories and Lib Dems have confirmed they will support Scottish Labour’s bid to oust the First Minister.
Alba and the Greens expressed some scepticism - though neither have explicitly ruled out voting for the measure.
Mr Salmond's offer was never likely to be palatable to Mr Yousaf and the SNP. One senior source described it as a "delusional."
The former first minister told the Sunday Times that he wanted to see the SNP back his “Scotland United” plan.
He told the paper: “If you remember the Scotland United idea from last year which Humza just ignored, which was very popular with the Yes groups and amongst SNP supporters,” said Salmond.
“It would be difficult to revive it in full now because obviously candidates have been selected [for the general election], but it could be revived in part, or there could be an understanding for the Scottish elections in two years time.
“So a discussion along these lines, so it’s a menu of independence options.”
He added: “We are asking to put independence back as the top priority of the government, which clearly it isn’t now.”
READ MORE: SNP's Kate Forbes hopes Scottish Greens will 'embrace' her
Currently, the SNP holds 61 of Scotland’s 73 Holyrood constituencies.
The only seat held by Alba is Ash Regan’s Edinburgh Eastern, which she initially won for the SNP before defecting.
Labour’s Monica Lennon tweeted: “Wonder if any SNP MSPs will volunteer to step aside to help seal this deal?”
Asked about the offer, a spokesperson for the First Minister told the Sun: "This is fantasy. There is no possibility of the First Minister agreeing any deal like this with Alex Salmond."
On Friday night, Mr Yousaf wrote to the leaders of the other Holyrood political parties to seek “common ground”.
He hopes to hold separate meetings with each group at Bute House in Edinburgh to discuss how they can “contribute constructively.”
Mr Ross, the Scottish Tory leader, described it as a "humiliating and embarrassing letter, in which Humza Yousaf is begging to be allowed to keep his job."
“His belated abandonment of the Bute House Agreement with the toxic Greens – which he was backing just two days before he finally decided to pull the plug – does nothing to undo the immense damage it has caused.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf faces a crisis – of his own making, says Brian Taylor
The Scottish Greens said they would respond formally to the First Minister in due course, but otherwise their position is unchanged.
Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie has said it is “pretty clear” Mr Yousaf will not be able to unite Holyrood.
Speaking on Friday, Scottish Labour’s Anas Sarwar said: “I am more than happy to engage with people of all parties, but it is clear that Humza Yousaf is out of time.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel