Scotland’s ferry policy is “manifestly dysfunctional” and must be overhauled, an expert has said.
In a submission to a Transport Scotland consultation on its Island Connectivity plan, Roy Pedersen criticised the current process of “the state procuring large, inefficient ships! which he says “will increase the already high financial cost to the Scottish taxpayer”.
In a 36-page report submitted to the consultation, Mr Pedersen – who owns a transport consultancy and previously worked as head of community, culture and transport at Highlands and Islands Enterprise – recommended moving to a model which would include simpler ferries, with smaller crews on shorter, more frequent crossings.
He said it was time to move away from a model where vessels were “manned by large live-aboard crew complements, operating on longer routes than necessary, running to overly complex labour-intensive terminals”.
The Scottish Government has previously announced its intention to directly award the contract for the Clyde and Hebrides network to the publicly-owned CalMac operator.
But Mr Pedersen urged the Scottish Government to “un-bundle” the routes on the network and allow other firms to submit bids.
He also pushed for operators to bring their own vessels to the routes, which he said would “wholly remove the need for government capital funding of vessels, bringing a saving of an average of perhaps a further £50 million per annum”.
READ MORE: MV Glen Rosa launched at shipyard on River Clyde
This move would effectively shutter the Scottish Government’s publicly-owned ferry procurer Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL), which the report claims should eventually be “wound up”.
“All this will not happen without capable and informed ministerial direction and leadership,” Mr Pedersen wrote.
“It will require a steady political nerve, but the prize will be greatly improved connectivity to enable our island and remote peninsular communities to flourish, while freeing up large sums of precious taxpayer funds to support Scotland’s struggling public services.
“Failure to grasp this opportunity will inevitably result in ever more public money being poured into a dysfunctional system while our island communities decline.”
Increased investment, he said, would be required to improve road links to ports while islands would benefit from increased population if crews can be encouraged to live on the islands they serve.
Duncan Mackison, the interim chief executive of CalMac, said: “Everyone at CalMac is committed to providing a quality and reliable ferry service and this is reflected in our reliability and punctuality figures, which consistently remain at more than 95% and improved in the last financial year.
“However, we fully share customer concerns regarding cancellations and disruptions and are working closely with third parties and stakeholders to address these issues, whilst also investing record sums in our ageing fleet to maintain resilience.
“This investment in maintenance grew to well over £43 million in 2023 compared with just £20 million in 2017.”
While a spokeswoman for CMAL said: “Unfortunately, Mr Pedersen’s report oversimplifies a highly complex matter.
READ MORE: CalMac boss steps down 'with immediate effect' after leadership review
“For example, building new ports in remote parts of Scotland and ensuring suitable road access would be a multi-million-pound project, and that’s before replacing an entire fleet of ships.
“Consideration must also be given to the wider socio-economic impact an increase in traffic would have in some areas, as well as the devastating effect the removal of ferry services from some ports would have on local communities.”
Transport Scotland have been contacted for comment.
Mr Pedersen – who has appeared repeatedly before Holyrood committees to discuss ferries – also weighed in on the long-running “fiasco” of the two late and over-budget ferries being built at Ferguson Marine in Port Glasgow.
The running political sore could have been avoided, he said, had CMAL opted to commission two 98-car catamarans from an Australian-based yard – at a cost of £12 million each – or a similar design, which would “be more economical to operate and have superior sea-keeping, manoeuvrability and environmental qualities”.
“CalMac, and especially CMAL, seem oblivious to the concept of value for money and show insufficient understanding of the usage of ship design to overcome difficulties rather than play into difficulties created by their approach to design,” he wrote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel