Douglas Ross has said he will vote against the assisted dying bill meaning the leaders of all three main parties will oppose the proposals when they come to a vote in Holyrood later this year.
The Scottish Conservative leader joins First Minister Humza Yousaf and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar in saying they have concerns about the plans being brought forward by Lib Dem MSP Liam McArthur.
Mr Yousaf outlined his opposition to Mr McArthur's bill in a newspaper interview last autumn while Mr Sarwar made his views clear earlier this week.
Mr Ross spoke out after the bill was introduced to Holyrood yesterday, the final day before a two week Easter recess. But although he would vote against the plans, his party would grant a free or conscience vote to its MSPs.
READ MORE: Lawyers examine assisted dying plan to avoid gender bill style clash
He said he had concerns whether there was sufficient safeguards in the proposals to protect vulnerable people.
“I have carefully considered the proposals in this proposed legislation and have received many emails and letters from constituents who both support and oppose assisted dying," he said.
Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross will oppose the assisted dying bill. His party's MSPs will be allowed a free vote on the proposals when they are voted on in Holyrood. Photo PA.
“Ultimately, I have concerns about the proposed legislation and have not been convinced that it contains adequate safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals. For these reasons I will not be supporting the bill when it comes to Parliament.
READ MORE: Landmark assisted dying legislation to be introduced in Holyrood
“However, I recognise that this is a conscience issue for many, and that there are passionately-held opinions on both sides of the debate. That is why this should be, and is, a free vote for Scottish Conservative MSPs.”
Speaking last year Mr Yousaf said his opposition to assisted dying plans has hardened after talks with disability campaigners.
The First Minister said people with disabilities feared they would be the “thin end of the wedge” if the proposals became law.
READ MORE: SNP to consider recall bill as pressure mounts over Matheson
In an interview with the Record, he said: “My view has always been to be open minded to the discussion, but I have not been persuaded and I feel even less persuaded after a recent discussion with the Glasgow Disability Alliance.
“I went to meet with [chief executive] Tressa Burke and a whole group of individuals, people with disabilities, and they were incredibly strong in their opposition to assisted dying, given that they felt that they would be the ones, as they described it, that would be the thin end of the wedge when it came to assisted dying.”
Sources close to Mr Yousaf told The Herald last night that his views expressed last year had not change and he continue to oppose the assisted dying legislation.
Mr Sarwar said earlier this week he is "yet to be convinced" of the case for a radical change.
The Scottish Labour leader said he was "not currently minded" to support the Assisted Dying Bill when it is put to a vote at Holyrood.
Scottish Greens co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater and Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton will vote for the bill.
Legislation to introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people in Scotland was published in Holyrood yesterday - with Mr McArthur insisting there is "compelling evidence" to support the move.
He said he is "confident" the Scottish Parliament will back his legislation when it comes before it for a vote, adding "robust safeguards" are included in the Bill.
A consultation by Mr McArthur ahead of publication of his Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill found 76% of the 14,038 people who took part fully support such a change, with another 2% partially supporting it.
Opponents of the legislation have said they fear it would see the lives of people who are ill or disabled being "devalued", with the Bishop of Paisley John Keenan branding it is a "dangerous idea".
With Holyrood likely to vote on the proposals later this year, it will be the third time MSPs have considered the issue - with two previous attempts to change the law overwhelmingly defeated.
Mr McArthur said MSPs will "want to look closely at the detail and consider the compelling evidence supporting a change in the law", but he added: "I'm confident Parliament will back my proposals to give terminally ill adults the choice they need."
His Bill sets out plans to give people over the age of 16 with an advanced terminal illness the option of requesting an assisted death.
They would have to have the mental capacity to make such a request, which would have to be made voluntarily without them being coerced.
Two doctors would have to be satisfied of the patient's condition, and also that they have not been pressurised into their decision.
Only people who have lived in Scotland for at least a year would be allowed to make such a request. The Bill also sets out a mandatory 14-day "reflection" period between a qualifying patient making a request and being given the necessary medication.
At this point, a medical professional would make a final check on the patient's capacity.
Mr McArthur said: "This Bill contains robust safeguards, similar to those which have been safely and successfully introduced in countries such as Australia, New Zealand and the United States, where they continue to enjoy strong public support.
"Our current laws on assisted dying are failing too many terminally ill Scots at the end of life.
"Too often, and despite the best efforts of palliative care, dying people are facing traumatic deaths that harm both them and those they leave behind.
"Polling has consistently shown overwhelming public support for assisted dying, and now I believe that politicians are catching up with where the public has been for some time."
A survey by campaign group Dignity in Dying found an average of 78% support for the Bill across Scotland, with the group saying this shows "an unshakeable majority of support" for the change.
Ally Thomson, director of Dignity in Dying Scotland, said: "The message from constituents to their MSPs is strikingly clear - it is time to change the law and vote to give dying people the choice of safe and compassionate assisted dying.
"The Bill published today provides the compassion and choice dying people need and puts safety and protection in place where none currently exists."
But Bishop Keenan said: "Liam McArthur has today published a damaging Bill which attacks human dignity and introduces a dangerous idea that a citizen can lose their value and worth.
"Assisted suicide sends a message that there are situations when suicide is an appropriate response to one's individual circumstances, worries, anxieties.
"It normalises suicide and accepts that some people are beyond hope.
"Furthermore, assisted suicide undermines trust in doctors and damages the doctor-patient relationship.
"In countries where assisted suicide is legal, there is evidence that vulnerable people, including the elderly and disabled, experience external pressure to end their lives."
Dr Gillian Wright, a former palliative care registrar who is part of the Our Duty of Care campaign, also spoke out against the proposals.
She said: "The primary danger of assisted -suicide is that individual lives are devalued by society because they are ill, disabled, confused, or that their contribution to society is perceived to be minimal.
"We are encouraged that ordinary doctors and nurses from across Scotland have joined together to send a definite message to MSPs.
Former MP and MSP Dennis Canavan, who has seen three of his children die from terminal illnesses, also urged Holyrood to vote against the Bill.
He said: "I have probably had more than my fair share of deaths in my family, having suffered the loss of four children, three of them as the result of terminal illness.
"My children undoubtedly underwent some pain, but it was minimised by caring health professionals. As a result, my children died in dignity and I do not accept that the option of assisted suicide is necessary to ensure dignity in death."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel