Staff shortages, broken equipment, and rising referrals have been blamed as Scotland experienced its worst year on record for cancer waiting times.
Campaigners warned that frontline staff are "working in crisis conditions" as statistics revealed that the NHS in Scotland has now missed the 31-day target for patients starting cancer treatment in five out of the past six quarters.
The 62-day target - the maximum time patients should wait between an urgent referral for cancer tests and starting treatment - has not been met since 2012.
READ MORE:
- Scotland's 'woeful' cancer survival rates among worst in Western world
- The 'extraordinary' AI trial detecting cancers missed by human radiologists
- Cancer incidence in Scotland set to increase by 22% by 2040
Kate Seymour, head of advocacy at Macmillan Cancer Support, said Scotland's cancer waiting times saw "the worst year on record in 2023 and are still worsening".
She said: "Hundreds of people each month continue to face anxiously long waits for cancer treatment and the cancer workforce in Scotland is exhausted, working in crisis conditions. It’s unsustainable.
“In September 2023’s Programme for Government, the First Minister committed the Health Secretary to deliver ‘demonstrable improvement’ in cancer waiting times by April 2024.
"Today's figures show this will clearly not be achieved. This can’t go on.
"It is crucial that the Scottish Government takes action to ensure their own targets can be met and people living with cancer can get the care they need and deserve, now and in the future.”
In 2023 almost 1,500 people with cancer in Scotland waited more than a month to start treatment following the clinical decision to do so, and just over 5,000 waited more than two months to start treatment following an urgent referral for suspected cancer.
Overall, 94.1% of patients who started cancer treatment between October and December last year had done so within 31 days of a decision to treat, against a target of 95%.
On the 62-day standard, the figure was 71.1%.
However, performance is particularly concerning for certain cancer types, such as urological cancer, with fewer than half (46%) of these patients starting treatment within two months of an urgent referral for tests last year.
Health boards responding to Public Health Scotland described a litany of problems ranging from faulty scanners resulting in imaging backlogs to consultant vacancies and bed shortages.
NHS Ayrshire and Arran reported that vacancies in pathology and radiology and "MRI scanner breakdowns" were leading to backlogs and delays in cancer patients being diagnosed, with bed capacity also "very challenged" - though cancer patients continue to be prioritised for admission and surgery.
NHS Borders said it is struggling to meet demand using its single CT scanner and has submitted a business case for a second machine.
In Fife, a "sustained increase" in patients being urgently referred with a suspicion of cancer is "impacting prostate and colorectal pathways in particular", while a breakdown of its PET scanner has "created long delays within the lung pathway".
NHS Forth Valley said it is experiencing "workforce challenges across all specialties" along with equipment issues, including a "transient failure of one of our scanners" and huge demand on its two CT scanners. It is also seeking a third machine.
NHS Grampian describes "staff vacancies in multiple areas" as well as issues with "bed capacity, theatre capacity, and delayed discharges" holding up treatment.
Along with a high levels of cancer referrals, it also noted that its A&E departments are seeing "continued high numbers of emergency presentations" among patients with cancer.
Tayside said "equipment faults requiring repair and downtime" had affected its PET-CT scanner, while both Highland and Lothian said they are struggling to fill radiology vacancies in particular.
In Greater Glasgow and Clyde - Scotland's largest health board - "significant pressure on pre-diagnosis steps, such as outpatient appointments and diagnostic procedures" were blamed for waiting times difficulties, along with higher numbers of cancer referrals compared to the pre-Covid period.
Across Scotland as a whole, cancer referral rates have increased by 17% between December 2019 and December 2023, from 82 to 97 eligible referrals per 100,000 population.
However, these figures only cover people referred for tests who are subsequently diagnosed with cancer.
It does not include, for example, people sent for investigations as a result of worrying symptoms or a suspected cancer picked up during routine screening where it turned out to be a false alarm.
Cancer incidence in Scotland is projected to rise by 22% by 2040, largely driven by an ageing population, meaning that demand for diagnosis and treatment will inevitably grow.
Dr Sandesh Gulhane, a GP and shadow health secretary for the Scottish Conservatives, said Scotland faces "a terrifying ticking timebomb of cancer cases" as he urged Scotland's new Health Secretary, Neil Gray, to "get a grip on cancer waiting times".
He added: “It should be a source of shame for [the SNP] that well over a quarter of cancer patients are waiting over two months to begin treatment.
“Everyone knows someone who has been diagnosed with this awful disease and how critical it is to start treatment quickly to boost their chances of survival."
Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, Dame Jackie Baillie, said: “We know the pandemic led to an increase of undiagnosed cancer cases but the government’s promises on recovery in cancer services are meaningless as far too many patients are not seen within the performance standard."
Health Secretary Neil Gray said that cancer "remains a national priority for the NHS and Scottish Government".
He added: "We're treating more patients on 62 and 31-day pathways than before the Covid-19 pandemic - over 700 more and over 400 more respectively in this latest quarter.
"The 31-day standard was narrowly missed this quarter, and the median wait for treatment was just five days.
"Nevertheless, we remain absolutely committed to reducing waiting times and a further £10 million of funding has been given in 2023-24 to support this improvement."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel