Scotland's grouse moors will be forced to take part in a new licensing regime after MSPs overwhelmingly backed strict legislation clamping down on raptor killing.
The Wildlife Management and Muirburn Bill was backed by 85 to 30, with only the Tories and SNP rebel Fergus Ewing voting against.
The disgraced former health secretary, Michael Matheson backed the law, voting remotely.
As well as the new licensing system, the Bill brings in bans on snares and glue traps and gives new powers to Scottish SPCA inspectors to tackle wildlife crime.
It also strictly regulates the use of muirburn, the use of fire as a land management tool.
Agriculture Minister Jim Fairlie said the bill was "a significant step in our wider journey to ensure Scotland’s environment is managed sustainably."
However, Scottish Tory rural affairs spokeswoman Rachael Hamilton said the legislation was “conceptually flawed” and reflected the “derision the Government has for rural Scotland”.
The legislation was tabled in the face of fierce resistance from shooting estates and gamekeepers. It was developed following a lengthy investigation and report by an expert group on grouse moor management, chaired by Professor Alan Werritty.
That review was ordered after NatureScot found in 2017 that a third of satellite-tagged golden eagles had vanished in "suspicious circumstances".
Speaking in Holyrood, Mr Fairlie said the legislation would not have been needed if the practice of raptor persecution had been “shut down”.
He said there would be no “victory parade” in the Bill’s passing as he recognised the concerns of those who work “legally and responsibly” in moorland pursuits.
He said: “There are those who disagree with the principles of this Bill.
“But had the grouse shooting community shut down raptor persecution, had stopped killing our most iconic birds of prey, we would not have had to legislate in this way.
“But, sadly, they didn’t shut it down, so now it’s up to us to make sure that they do.
“This Bill has caused concern for folk who work legally and responsibly in moorland pursuits, and I completely understand that.
“I want to be clear there should be no victory parade here because this Government recognises the economic contribution and their efforts in combating biodiversity laws.”
Ms Hamilton disagreed.
She said the bill, which passed its final stage in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday by 85 votes to 30, was "just a classic example of the Green tail... wagging the yellow dog and the antipathy of the Scottish Greens towards people that live in rural areas."
The Tory MSP added: “Country sports are like catnip for the Scottish Greens and we should be in no doubt that the disproportionality in this scheme is their doing, with SNP ministers too weak to say no – and again rural Scotland suffers the consequences.”
Ross Ewing, director of moorland at Scottish Land and Estates, said: “Licensing of grouse shooting represents a seismic change for rural estates and their employees, including gamekeepers and shepherds.
“The legislation goes far beyond the stated intention of deterring the persecution of raptors by introducing a broad range of relevant offences under which licences can be suspended or revoked. Many of these offences bear no connection to land managed for grouse shooting.”
He said the licensing scheme should be as “light-touch” as possible.
Wildlife campaigner and TV presenter Chris Packham described it as a "gamechanger."
Snares BANNED , grouse shooting , muirburn and wildlife traps LICENSED , powers for @ScottishSPCA INCREASED . . .
— Chris Packham (@ChrisGPackham) March 21, 2024
The Wildlife Management & Muirburn Bill has now passed in Scotland – congratulations to all who campaigned for this historic moment 🏴 pic.twitter.com/5FHyOoeovF
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel