GB News has been “put on notice” by the broadcasting regulator after breaching impartiality rules in five episodes of programmes hosted by serving Tory MPs.
However it will not receive any sanctions unless there is a repeat of the offence.
Two of the episodes were hosted by former House of Commons leader Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg and three by Esther McVey and her husband Philip Davies, who are both MPs.
Ofcom said the episodes, broadcast in May and June last year, all failed to present the news with “due impartiality” as the MPs were acting as news readers and presenters.
The watchdog said politicians “cannot be a newsreader, news interviewer or news reporter unless, exceptionally, there is editorial justification”.
The five programmes “contained a mix of news and current affairs”, it said.
“We found that host politicians acted as newsreaders, news interviewers or news reporters in sequences which clearly constituted news – including reporting breaking news events – without exceptional justification.
"News was, therefore, not presented with due impartiality.
It said the decision had been reached after “careful consideration of the facts in each case - including forensic analysis of the content and detailed representations from GB News”.
It said: “Politicians have an inherently partial role in society and news content presented by them is likely to be viewed by audiences in light of that perceived bias.
“In our view, the use of politicians to present the news risks undermining the integrity and credibility of regulated broadcast news.
“We therefore considered it was necessary and proportionate to find a breach of Rules 5.1 and 5.3 [of the Broadcasting Code] in these circumstances.
Ms McVey was made a minister in the cabinet office last November.
She and Mr Davies are no longer part of the GB News line-up, and last hosted programmes on the channel last year.
The development comes after a series of controversies for GB News, including an epsiode of Dan Wootton Tonight last September airing offensive content when presenter Laurence Fox made highly person comments about a female journalist.
Ofcom said the remarks has been "degrading and demeaning" and "clearly and unambiguously misogynistic".
Because the latest Ofcom controversy features Tory MPs, it is likely to fuel the narrative that Rishi Sunak's party is undisciplined and shambolic going into the election.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak tells Tories to ‘stick to the plan’ amid reports of plot
Ofcom also said it did not find a breach involving a sixth programme hosted by Mr Rees-Mogg as there had been exceptional circumstances.
"In the case of this live programme, Jacob Rees-Mogg was used as an eye-witness, in situ news reporter during an unforeseen security incident at Buckingham Palace.”
It warned that further breaches of the Broadcasting Code by the right-leaning channel could result in a “statutory sanction”.
Ofcom has the power to impose fines, suspend or even revoke a broadcast licence.
It said: “These are the first breaches of Rules 5.1 and 5.3 recorded against GB News.
“Since opening these investigations, there has only been one further programme which has raised issues warranting investigation under these rules.
“We are clear, however, that GB News is put on notice that any repeated breaches of Rules 5.1 and 5.3 may result in the imposition of a statutory sanction.”
The programmes breaching the code were two episodes of Jacob Rees-Mogg’s State of the Nation, two episodes of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil, and one episode of Saturday Morning with Esther and Phil.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel