A senior figure in real estate development in Scotland has claimed “incalculable damage” has been done to the Scottish economy by rent price controls.
It comes as 90 per cent of landlords flatly rejected future rent rise curbs, or caps, in a new Holyrood survey after the build to rent market in Scotland tanked overnight when initial measures to help with the cost of living were introduced.
While many have argued it was a vital intervention to prevent rents outreaching tenants as inflation gripped, its benefits have been contested.
As it is pointed out by one industry insider, the findings of the Scottish Government landlord and tenant questionnaire provided few surprises.
Will Scarlett, founder and director of Scarlett Land and Development, told LinkedIn that there has been “incalculable damage to the Scottish economy” and that “the real loser” is the person seeking to rent “a new, fossil-free, low running cost and affordable home”.
He said that with “no new supply, demand [is] off the scale”.
"Nowhere was the fundamental question asked 'do you agree with rent control?'"
Despite this, respondents made their point in the survey.
READ MORE: Did rent cap fail to keep costs under control?
In the Scottish Government’s analysis of email responses, under views on rent control, it is found that: “In terms of a particular policy area, respondents were most likely to comment on rent controls, with around three in five raising the issue. The considerable majority of those (around nine in ten), including most of those who identified themselves as private landlords, noted their opposition to the introduction of rent controls.
“Among the more frequently expressed views were that respondents felt the introduction of rent controls was already leading to landlords exiting the sector, and that this trend will continue.
“Respondents stated that since rent caps have been introduced, private rents in Scotland have risen faster than anywhere else in the UK; it was felt that the decision to pursue a policy of rent control fails to address the shortage of rental housing, and that this shortage is exacerbating rent inflation.”
In response to the concerns raised, Patrick Harvie, Tenants’ Rights Minister, told The Herald he is “grateful to those who took the time to provide a response to the landlord and tenant engagement questionnaire”, adding: “Analysis highlights a variety of views on rental sector reform, and these findings have been carefully considered in our proposals to deliver a New Deal for Tenants.”
While the existing emergency legislation is due to end in April, he said: “We will continue to engage with stakeholders from across the sector on our long-term commitment to develop a workable system of rent controls for Scotland.”
Mr Harvie also said: “Private renting is a very dynamic sector and has always been characterised by some landlords leaving and others entering. Rent control systems are widespread across Europe, including in some countries with larger private rented sectors than in Scotland.”
The Scottish Property Federation’s David Melhuish told this column in January that “there is still some £2.5bn of new investment and a total pipeline of some 17,000 modern rental homes of all types of tenure that could still happen in the next few years if the government provides the right platform for investment”.
However, this came after it was estimated that when caps were introduced in September 2022, £700m worth of build to rent schemes were put on hold “at the onset of the decision”.
Elsewhere, business editor Ian McConnell pointed to some positive news for Scotland in his Called to Account column, writing: “It has been heartening, albeit in the context of the UK’s economic malaise, to observe some positive readings on the Scottish economy recently.”
In the Business Briefing, Kristy Dorsey writes that Alastair Macphie, great nephew of the founder of Scottish food group Macphie, is stepping down as chairman after 17 years in the role and 37 years in total at the company.
Also this week, deputy business editor Scott Wright points to “the major projects offering hope for the future of Glasgow” in his Thursday column.
And finally, the controversial City of Edinburgh coin toss moment has been reversed, and the green light was given to over 250 new homes in the Scottish capital on original terms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel