Muriel Gray told staff that other organisations 'could learn from the success' of Glasgow School of Art £35million restoration project.
The former chairwoman of the school's Board of Governers made the comment at a staff meeting on March 11, 2019, eight months after the blaze in June 2018 which gutted the building as it was nearing the end of the restoration.
Around £24million was raised through public donations for the project.
A full size prototype of the prized library was created before work began on site in 2018 and specialist woodworkers used the same nails as the original - no screws or glue - to add to the authenticity of their recreation.
Speaking to The Herald for this week's series Ms Gray said: "It was a brilliant and stunningly beautiful reconstruction on time and on budget.
"We were massively proud of it and incredibly excited about its reopening."
She described the destruction of the building and restoration as 'heartbreaking."
The meeting was held after a parliamentary report was published which accused the school of failing to protect the 110-year old listed building from the "significant and obvious" risk of fire.
Professor Gordon Gibb, former head of Architectural Practice at the GSA recalled his surprise that Ms Gray had used the word 'success'.
He said another employee had asked what the school considered was the way forward after the two fires and subsequent Holyrood inquiry.
He said: "It was as though the fire had not happened nine months before, even though the fire and the PR disaster of the parliamentary committee was what this {meeting} was all about.
"It struck a chord with me as being hilarious and because questions were being sought I tried to ask the question 'How do you measure success?'
He claims that Ms Gray interjected saying: 'We are accepting questions from everyone here except Gordon Gibb.'
Prof Gibb claims he was sacked from his role as the architecture department's director of professional studies for ‘bringing the institution into disrepute’ and ‘damaging its reputation’. He took the school to an employment tribunal claiming unfair dismissal but lost his case.
The architect had been carrying out his own investigations and was critical of the school's leadership and fire prevention strategy in the parliamentary inquiry.
He said: "What she [Muriel Gray] was trying to do was ignore that the building was gone and try to focus on her own efforts to get the project [rebuild] off the ground after the first fire and expand it to a wider project fixing other parts of the building using the excess money they had got beyond the insurance from the fundraising drive.
"The intention of the meeting was to spin the issue where despite the constant rebuttals from the GSA in the press, the criticism from the parliamentary committee and the press was sinking in."
Muriel Grey announced in September 2021 that she was stepping down as chair of the GSA after eight years.
She said it had been ‘the greatest honour’ to help with governing the institution but that it is time for a ‘fresh, energetic, and long-term committed person’ to take over the role.
There have been other controversies, during her tenure, including the departure of the former GSA director Tom Inns in 2019.
Leaked emails revealed he was put on sick leave ‘against his wishes’ just weeks before he resigned.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel