The SNP's depute leader has called for a Scottish Conservative MSP to be sacked as a general election candidate for his party when he refused to back down after accusing Humza Yousaf of a conflict of interest over awarding humanitarian aid to Gaza.
Keith Brown demanded the action after Stephen Kerr declined to apologise yesterday for saying on Saturday that "the First Minister was prepared to bend the rules and not follow procedure" over funding given to an agency in the war torn territory when Mr Yousaf's parents in law were trapped there under the Israeli military's bombardment.
His comments were made in a report in a front page report in the Telegraph with the paper claiming Mr Yousaf overruled officials who advised Unicef receive a donation of £100,000 and £200,000 to instead give £250,000 to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNWRA).
The funding was announced by the Scottish Government last November in response to a flash international appeal for emergency aid as more than a million Palestinians faced displacement amid the conflict with Israel.
Taking to social media on Saturday the First Minister described the Telegraph's report as an "outrageous smear", a view also shared by other SNP politicians and some Labour MSPs.
But appearing on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show yesterday, Mr Kerr accused the First Minister of over-reacting.
Mr Kerr said: "I don't regret the words I used."
Responding to Mr Kerr's interview on the programme, Mr Brown said the the Prime Minister – who recently gave a speech on tackling extremism – must urgently condemn the peddling of such "poisonous, far-right conspiracy theories" which he claimed the Telegraph had made.
He added: "As for Stephen Kerr, he is utterly unfit to stand for election, and the Tory party must sack him as a candidate.
“The SNP will continue to call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and stand up for Scotland’s values at Westminster – which are in direct opposition to those perpetuated by the Tories and right-wing media outlets.
“By voting SNP at the general election we can achieve real change, which only independence offers.”
Mr Kerr had told the newspaper: “The First Minister has some serious explaining to do, starting with why he overrode officials to take money away from the vital Unicef water programme and assign it to UNRWA.
“It looks as if the money was not budgeted and that the First Minister was prepared to bend the rules and not follow procedure.
“Humza Yousaf has a clear conflict of interest in the awarding of aid to Gaza. Clearly, the fact that so many members of his family are either living in Gaza or are involved with Palestinian organisations raises significant questions about what his motivation is for using taxpayers’ money in the area.”
Asked on the BBC Sunday Show if he would retract his comments or soften them, Mr Kerr replied 'no'.
It was pointed out to Mr Kerr that governments around the world made similar decisions so that the aid could be directed in a fast and flexible way.
Mr Kerr said he was raising 'reasonable' questions in order to hold the government to account and he believed the First Minister had over-reacted in his reaction to the article.
"There is nothing unusual in asking questions about how decisions were made and why they were made," he said.
"And the reaction of the First Minister I felt was an over-reaction."
He then went on to say he would not be "apologising" and didn't regret the words he had used.
Mr Kerr added: "No one who watched the trauma that the First Minister went through in the days and weeks when his family were stuck, locked in Gaza. Of course there was an issue of personal interest."
The presenter said not everyone accepted there was an issue of personal interest in the funding made to Gaza.
He said the First Minister could have an personal involvement in the situation while the Scottish Government devoted humanitarian aid to people in the area.
Mr Kerr replied: "That being the case, the question is very simple: what happened and why did it happen."
In his response to the report Mr Yousaf accused The Telegraph on Saturday of peddling far-right, Islamophobic conspiracy theories over the £250,000 donation to the UNRWA “to support displaced people in Gaza access food, water, shelter and medical supplies”.
At the time, Mr Yousaf’s parents-in-law, Elizabeth El-Nakla and her husband, Maged, were trapped in Gaza. The couple had travelled to the city in October to visit Maged’s mother, who had a stroke in March.
Responding on Twitter/X, Mr Yousaf said: “I don’t usually respond to smears against me or my family but this story is so outrageous it requires a response. Most of my political life, I’ve battled insinuations from sections of the media desperate to link me to terrorism despite campaigning my whole life against it.”
The “latest smear” from The Telegraph is just a continuation of these Islamophobic attacks, Mr Yousaf said.
“To be clear, the Scottish government gave money to Gaza, like virtually every government in the West, because of the unarguable humanitarian catastrophe that has unfolded there.
"Funding to UNRWA was deemed the most flexible way of ensuring money got to where it was needed. Hence why so many governments, including the UK, gave millions to them.”
According to The Telegraph, Mr Yousaf told officials that since he was about to meet UNRWA officials “we should just announce an extra £250k to them” rather than give money to Unicef, a different UN agency, which was recommended by staff.
A spokesman for Mr Yousaf denied the donation was connected to his family and said there was a “rigorous process to ensure complete transparency and accountability” in the allocation of money from the International Development Fund.
The First Minister then went online to personally reject any accusations of conflict of interest.
He reiterated that the aid agency had no role in helping his in-laws flee the conflict — they arrived back in Scotland on November 5 two days after escaping Gaza — adding they were able to leave because of “the hard work of the crisis team at the FCDO [Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office], like every other British national”.
He added: “To suggest otherwise is a flat-out lie and smear.”
Mr Yousaf has often spoken out about abuse he has received because of his Muslim faith.
He wrote: “I can not tell you the trauma my family has suffered, particularly during the weeks my in-laws were trapped there.
“To peddle far-right conspiracies in a newspaper is outrageous and will only encourage a further pile-on of vile abuse my family and I have suffered throughout this period.”
He added: “Due to my faith and race, there will always be those, particularly on the far-right, who will desperately try to ‘prove’ my loyalties lie elsewhere.”
UNRWA has since been at the centre of controversy surrounding Israeli accusations that members of its staff were involved in the October 7 attacks by Hamas that triggered the fighting.
Several countries, including the UK, have announced a pause in support for the relief agency while an investigation takes place.
A spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives said: "The First Minister has questions to answer over why he chose to override official advice on which agency to award this public money to - especially as Keith Brown was unable to shed any light on it.
"As the SNP deputy leader himself said, it's legitimate for these issues to be raised in parliament, which is why the Scottish Conservatives have requested a ministerial statement on the decision-making process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel