A second council has defied Humza Yousaf’s plan to freeze council tax across Scotland.
Labour-run Inverclyde agreed to increase the levy by 8.2% from April to help address a £2.5m black hole in the council’s finances for 2024/25.
It means the bill for a Band D home will rise £127 a year from £1,429 to £1,547.
As part of a two-year budget, the tax will rise by a further 6% in 2025/26.
The rises are on top of a 5.3% tax rise in 2023/24, meaning a 21% rise over three years in Inverclyde.
The vote was a further blow to the First Minister and his finance secretary Shona Robison, who had been trying for months to achieve a nation-wide freeze.
Inverclyde council leader Stephen McCabe said the idea of a nationally-directed tax freeze was “wholly undemocratic”, as the decision was for councils, not ministers.
The Scottish Government’s plan was irresponsible, shameful, vindictive and an affront to democracy, he said, and would ultimately cost Inverclyde money.
He said a rise of 8.2% was "prudent and responsible" to safeguard public services, but admitted it would not be universally popular.
He said 28% of the lowest income homes in the council would not pay any more.
Read more from Tom Gordon:
Former SNP rising star charged over multiple alleged sex offences
Yousaf asks Westminster for help with 'difficult' child poverty target
Shona Robison plays the blame game at crunch budget vote
Labour's motion was passed by 11 votes to 9 with two abstentions around 630pm.
Mr Yousaf announced plans to keep the tax static at the SNP conference last October, ostensibly to help people with the cost of living.
However the move - which took councils by surprise - was widely seen as a panicked response to the SNP’s losing the Rutherglen & Hamilton West byelection days earlier.
Mr Yousaf and Ms Robison promised the freeze would be “fully funded” and offered Scotland’s 32 councils £147m between them to offset a 5% rise in the tax.
But after councils pushed back hard and demanded more money, Ms Robison last week admitted her initial offer was insufficient.
She then offered councils a further £62.7m, but said authorities would only get a share of the funding if they froze the levy.
In addition, £45m of the extra money was said to be conditional on Barnett formula monies resulting from the UK Government spending money on councils in England.
Argyll & Bute raised the tax regardless.
Inverclyde’s Labour leader Stephen McCabe also urged UK Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove to bypass Holyrood and send the Barnett money directly to councils, an idea backed by the Labour leader of West Dunbartonshire, Martin Rooney.
During the budget debate at Inverclyde Council today, Mr McCabe claimed his Labour colleagues had urged him to freeze the tax, leading to criticism from the SNP.
Mr McCabe said: “I stand up to my party. I get phone calls saying we shouldn’t be raising council tax, but I told my party leadership we will make the decisions, not them.”
Inverclyde SNP MSP Stuart McMillan said: "Anas Sarwar has totally lost control of his party. "The SNP introduced a fully funded council tax freeze to support households through the cost of living crisis.
"Thanks to pressure from the SNP, Anas Sarwar agreed with this policy.
"If Labour councillors are openly defying orders from their leader in Scotland, and bragging about it, Anas Sarwar must come forward and outline what action he will take against them.
"It is totally inappropriate that despite receiving funding to freeze council tax, labour councils across Scotland are considering hammering household budgets already struggling in the cost of living crisis with unnecessary tax rises."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel