This article appears as part of the Inside the NHS newsletter.
It is nearly two years since the Scottish Government announced a series of targets to "eradicate" very long waits for treatment on the NHS.
If it had gone to plan, by September 2024, there should be almost no one waiting to go into hospital for an operation who has been on the list for more than a year.
Unfortunately, the outlook is not good.
Instead of decreasing, statistics published on Tuesday reveal that the number of patients who had been waiting over a year for an inpatient or day case procedure had reached a new record high of 37,613 by the end of December. Back in December 2019, that figure was 1,299.
On top of this, health boards have now been told to "pause" work on any building projects that have not yet passed certain development milestones amid capital budget constraints. This leaves in limbo six out of the ten National Treatment Centres (NTCs) which were supposed to bulldoze through those waiting list backlogs.
Best laid plans
In July 2022, Humza Yousaf – then Health Secretary – pledged to drive down the number of patients facing very long waits for treatment.
In relation to inpatient and day case procedures, there were three specific targets.
By the end of September 2022, waits of over two years were supposed to be eliminated "in most specialities", followed by September 2023 for waits of 18 months or more, and September 2024 for waits of more than a year.
So far, none of these has been achieved.
As of December 31 2023, there were still 7,170 patients on the waiting list who had been waiting over two years – an increase of 5% compared to 6,789 in December 2022. Nearly 2000 of these people were waiting for some form of orthopaedic surgery, such as a hip or knee replacement.
The number of patients clocking up 18-month waits has also increased, from 16,390 in December 2022 to 17,761 by December 2023.
Meanwhile, waits of one year plus have gone from 35,311 to 37,613.
Among the statistics are also 1,446 patients whose time on the waiting list now exceeds three years.
The Scottish Government can argue that elective activity is increasing, which it is: the number of people admitted to hospital for planned treatment between September and December was up by 10% year-on-year.
At the same time, however, new patients are being added to the lists faster than they are being removed resulting in the overall size of the waiting list going up (it was 155,311 by the end of December, compared to 143,929 a year earlier).
Likewise, there is no getting away from the fact that the NHS is still carrying out fewer procedures than it was pre-pandemic and that, when it comes to longest waits, the statistics are going in the wrong direction.
Read more:
- Inside the NHS | Should we really move patients out of A&E and onto wards, even when there’s no bed?
- NHS in crisis: Have we finally dug a hole too deep to get out of?
- Special report: What's really going on behind the Scotland-England NHS waiting list divide?
-
Number funding private hospital treatment rising faster in Scotland than rest of UK
Shifting the goalposts?
Clearing the backlog built up during the pandemic was also a key promise of the Scottish Government's NHS Recovery Plan, first published in August 2021.
By the end of March 2024, NHS Scotland was supposed to be carrying out 15,500 procedures more than it was in pre-pandemic times, with an additional 19,000 coming from the new NTCs. Combined, this would represent a 13% uplift in activity versus 2019.
In reality, by December 2023, planned activity was nearly 20% lower than it had been in December 2019. This has been hindered partly by delays to the NTCs, only three of which – Highland, Fife and phase one of the Golden Jubilee expansion – are operational.
Audit Scotland, which published its yearly round-up of NHS Scotland last week, noted that it had previously advised the Scottish Government to "report clearly and transparently on progress made against the recovery plan, including whether any changes in indicated targets and timescales would be needed".
That would be a little too much like admitting defeat, however. Instead, the approach seems to be to hope that no one notices.
Sign up for Inside the NHS and read our health correspondent every week in your inbox.
Describing the government’s most recent progress update, published in December, Audit Scotland notes that "updates against a range of the ambitions are absent" and "other targets are mentioned but with no reference to the progress made".
It adds: "In some cases, the way progress towards specific ambitions is now being presented is also different from in the original recovery plan with no explanation given as to why."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel