Under their two former leaders, the SNP developed a knack for squashing legitimate criticism by effectively mobilising a populist rabble to drown out the nay-sayers. This relied on a powerful cult-of-personality which masqueraded as “progressive politics”, but was really never much more than performative leftism.
Nonetheless, it effectively cowed many members of the left, leaving only a small handful of outspoken critics who were willing to consistently challenge them. I have never shied away from holding truth to power and, over the last ten or so years, have attempted to expose the hypocrisy and corruption which has plagued the SNP administration from the very beginning.
At times this felt like a quixotic project, as successive Tory governments lacked the bravery and/or organisational capacity to properly inspect the actions of the Scottish government. However, of late, my task has been made much easier by an FM who seems incapable of keeping a lid on the scandals which bubbled away throughout the Salmond and Sturgeon years.
I have also been heartened by recent developments in the Lords, where two of my colleagues - Lord Wallace and Baroness Goldie - decided to step up and join me in this fight, creating a cross-party group which, we hope, might finally convince the UK government to rein in the SNP’s excesses.
This all came to fruition quite organically, after Baroness Goldie made an excellent contribution in the debate I raised, at the start of February, around devolved competencies. I have been badgering the government for many years on this issue, but rarely heard an argument which summarises the issues so succinctly.
To quote the Baroness: “As Scotland’s educational standards decline, its NHS faces acute challenges—not least the recruitment of consultants—and ferries languish in a Scottish government shipyard, overpriced, overdue and much needed by the operators, the response of the Scottish Government, not only to spend money on completely illegitimate and incompetent objectives, but to make Scotland the highest-taxed part of the United Kingdom, is, in the face of these challenges, as incomprehensible as it is regrettable.”
This is, in a nut-shell, the essence of many of my complaints, and shortly thereafter we decided it was high time for members of the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats to set aside their differences and unite, in common cause, for the greater good of Scotland.
Lord Wallace, Baroness Goldie and I may disagree on many other issues, but on this central issue we share a view that also surfaces weekly in our inboxes: the SNP are spending taxpayers’ money on bad-faith projects at the expense of Scotland’s public services.
An obvious example of this overreach is the huge public spend on new overseas “embassies” in countries which already have a Scottish Development International (SDI) office. SDIs are an excellent example of effective cross-party collaboration, established by the Labour-Lib Dem coalition in 2001, and I believe they play an important role in growing “brand Scotland” on the international stage.
Their very existence and numerous successes over the years, in drawing trade to Scotland, clearly demonstrates that these new offices are at best vanity projects which perform no function or, at worst, a deliberate attempt to create channels for foreign policy discussions which exclude the UK government.
Doubling up like this also causes confusion, for allied governments and businesses, around which channel should be used for communicating with the Scottish government, and it is fostering a deep resentment within Scots who would rather the money was spent on our NHS and education sector.
We have heard this message, despite many in Westminster continuing to plug their ears, and will continue to champion a thorough spending review, through a variety of campaign tactics, until the government finally takes action.
Unbridled spending is unwise even during times of economic growth, but it is particularly damaging for struggling families during this cost of living crisis. It is therefore imperative that we resolve whether these actions can be classed as devolved competencies, as the SNP claim: if so, the legal loopholes must be tightened, and if not, there must be appropriate consequences.
Lord George Foulkes is a former Labour MP and MSP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel