Humza Yousaf has been mocked by opponents after appearing to get his own party’s policy on achieving independence wrong.
In an interview with STV, he said winning the most seats in Scotland would be a mandate for the SNP to start negotiations with the UK Government.
However, the resolution backed by delegates at his party’s conference last October was that this would only happen if they won a majority of seats, rather than just at least one more than the next largest party.
READ MORE: SNP members back 'majority of seats' independence strategy
Speaking to Scotland Tonight, Mr Yousaf said: “If we win the general election, that's my goal, of course, to win the general election in Scotland, is use that as a mandate to begin negotiating with a future UK Government on how we give democratic effect to independence.”
Asked if that meant winning a majority, the First Minister replied: “Winning in Scotland means most seats. That's what our conference backed in October last year.”
When asked what he meant by most and if he meant a majority, Mr Yousaf replied: “A majority and most seats are different.”
He added: “I think most people understand the most means that you're going to win the general election.”
Asked if he would still be entitled to start negotiations even if the SNP fall short of a majority, Mr Yousaf said “The rule is pretty simple. The winner of the general election is the one that wins the most seats, so we intend to win the most seats.”
Currently, the SNP holds 48 of the 59 Scottish constituencies.
Boundary changes mean there will 57 seats after the election, and a majority would be reached if they win 29.
Asked if he would continue as leader even if he had lost 19 seats, Mr Yousaf told STV: "Yes, because we would have just won a general election in Scotland.
"I don’t know any other political leader who would win a general election and people would question whether they would be leader.
"My intention is to win that general election and the way we do that is with a really simple message - if you want Scotland’s voice to be heard by the Westminster establishment you have to vote for the SNP."
READ MORE: Explained: SNP independence strategy adopted at conference
Scottish Conservative Chairman Craig Hoy said: “Humza Yousaf and the SNP have made it abundantly clear they wish to turn the General Election into a proxy vote on independence.
“However, their plans are so extreme that the party’s own leader cannot even accurately tell Scots what he believes would give him a mandate to enter negotiations on breaking up the United Kingdom.
“The one thing Humza Yousaf is clear on is that their independence obsession will always be the number one priority for the SNP – and they are prepared to say anything to achieve it.”
Alba Party General Secretary Chris McEleny said: “The SNP now have a Rubik’s cube independence strategy. It has so many different aspects, caveats and explanations that even Humza Yousaf cannot remember what it is.
“Now that the consented referendum policy that served the national movement well previously has been blocked as a result of the ill-fated venture to the UK Supreme Court, Alba Party believes that every election must be used as a mandate for Scottish independence.
"And further the referendum proposed by Ash Regan on independence powers for the Scottish Parliament can get us past the constitutional roadblock.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel