Labour has suspended a second candidate in a row over antisemitism.
Graham Jones, the former MP for Hyndburn, who is standing for the seat at the next election, was recorded referring to “f***ing Israel” and that British people who have signed up to fight for the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) “should be locked up”.
The hopeful made the comments at the same meeting in which the party’s prospective MP for Rochdale claimed Israel allowed the 7 October attack to happen as a pretext to invade Gaza.
The Campaign Against Antisemitism said Labour needed to reveal which other MPs, candidates and councillors were at the event.
READ MORE: Azhar Ali withdrawn as Labour's Rochdale candidate
It’s another embarrassment for Sir Keir Starmer who was forced to withdraw support for Azhar Ali on Monday night.
That decision came after two days of the party defending the candidate.
At the meeting, he claimed Israel deliberately allowed 1,400 of its citizens to be massacred to give Benjamin Netanyahu’s government the “green light” to invade Gaza.
He also claimed that Sir Keir Starmer had “lost the confidence” of his MPs because of his unwillingness to back a ceasefire.
However, he was only suspended when it emerged that he also said Israel planned to “get rid of [Palestinians] from Gaza” as part of a “land grab” and blamed “people in the media from certain Jewish quarters” for pushing criticism of Andy McDonald, a Labour MP who used the “between the river and the sea” slogan last year.
Speaking to broadcasters on a visit to Wellingborough on Tuesday, Sir Keir defended not initially taking action against Mr Ali.
He said: “Certain information came to light over the weekend in relation to the candidate. There was a fulsome apology.
“Further information came to light yesterday calling for decisive action, so I took decisive action. It is a huge thing to withdraw support for a Labour candidate during the course of a by-election. It’s a tough decision, a necessary decision, but when I say the Labour Party has changed under my leadership I mean it.”
READ MORE: Labour by-election candidate claimed Israel allowed 7 October attack
Sir Keir said any allegations against other councillors at the meeting would be “fully investigated by the party”.
He said: “Those comments were appalling and that is why we took decisive action. It is virtually unprecedented to withdraw support for a candidate in the way I withdrew support from this candidate yesterday.
"That’s what a changed Labour Party is all about. Of course, any allegation will be fully investigated by the party, but the important thing is the decisive action that’s been taken to make it absolutely clear that this is a changed Labour Party.”
A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “We commend Labour for doing the right thing, and doing it swiftly.
"However, these new revelations are putting an even greater focus on that late October Lancashire meeting where both Azhar Ali and Graham Jones reportedly made their comments.
"It is time for Labour to reveal which other MPs, candidates and councillors were there and why they said nothing about the remarks that were made, and indeed if more such remarks were made.
"Labour must continue to put a line in the sand and declare that it will not tolerate extremist views. It is the least that we should be able to expect from all our political parties.
“The question remains: who else was at that October meeting, what else was said, and who else knew, and why did nobody act?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel